Evaluation of artificial neural networks in the classification of primary oesophageal dysmotility
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can rapidly analyse large data sets and exploit complex mathematical relationships between variables. We investigated the feasibility of utilizing ANNs in the recognition and objective classification of primary oesophageal motor disorders, based on stationary oesophageal manometry recordings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred swallow sequences, including 80 that were representative of various oesophageal motor disorders and 20 of normal motility, were identified from 54 patients (34 F; median age 59 years). Two different ANN techniques were trained to recognize normal and abnormal swallow sequences using mathematical features of pressure wave patterns both with (ANN(+)) and without (ANN(-)) the inclusion of standard manometric criteria. The ANNs were cross-validated and their performances were compared to the diagnoses obtained by standard visual evaluation of the manometric data. RESULTS: Interestingly, ANN(-), rather than ANN(+), programs gave the best overall performance, correctly classifying >80% of swallow sequences (achalasia 100%, nutcracker oesophagus 100%, ineffective oesophageal motility 80%, diffuse oesophageal spasm 60%, normal motility 80%). The standard deviation of the distal oesophageal pressure and propagated pressure wave activity were the most influential variables in the ANN(-) and ANN(+) programs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ANNs represent a potentially important tool that can be used to improve the classification and diagnosis of primary oesophageal motility disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pattern recognition techniques, including ANNs, are powerful mathematical models that can handle large data sets and classify data into groups according to nonlinear statistical analysis.
“Pattern recognition techniques, including artificial neural networks (ANNs), are powerful mathematical models which can handle large data sets and classify data into groups according to nonlinear statistical analysis.9-11”
From Artificial neural network classification of pharyngeal high‐resolution manometry with impedance data (2013) · cites this paper as [11]
ANNs have been used to analyze voice and swallow events, differentiating between normal and disordered events, as well as distinguishing among different types of disorders.
“ANNs have been used to analyze voice and swallow events, differentiating between normal and disordered events, as well as distinguishing among different types of disorders.9-12”
From Artificial neural network classification of pharyngeal high‐resolution manometry with impedance data (2013) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Santos, R., Haack, H. G., Maddalena, D., Hansen, R. D., & Kellow, J. E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kellow, John E.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-263
- ISSN
- 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-7708
- OpenAlex
- W2150551580
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Research Institute
- Bowel and Cancer Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- artificial neural networks, esophageal motility disorders, esophageal manometry, achalasia, automated diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Manometry, Middle Aged, Peristalsis, Pressure, Esophageal Motility Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review