Cited by 10Gastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsGastrointestinal motility and disordersArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Evaluation of artificial neural networks in the classification of primary oesophageal dysmotility

Santos, Robespierre, Haack, Horst G., Maddalena, Des, Hansen, Ross D., Kellow, John E.·2006·Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can rapidly analyse large data sets and exploit complex mathematical relationships between variables. We investigated the feasibility of utilizing ANNs in the recognition and objective classification of primary oesophageal motor disorders, based on stationary oesophageal manometry recordings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred swallow sequences, including 80 that were representative of various oesophageal motor disorders and 20 of normal motility, were identified from 54 patients (34 F; median age 59 years). Two different ANN techniques were trained to recognize normal and abnormal swallow sequences using mathematical features of pressure wave patterns both with (ANN(+)) and without (ANN(-)) the inclusion of standard manometric criteria. The ANNs were cross-validated and their performances were compared to the diagnoses obtained by standard visual evaluation of the manometric data. RESULTS: Interestingly, ANN(-), rather than ANN(+), programs gave the best overall performance, correctly classifying >80% of swallow sequences (achalasia 100%, nutcracker oesophagus 100%, ineffective oesophageal motility 80%, diffuse oesophageal spasm 60%, normal motility 80%). The standard deviation of the distal oesophageal pressure and propagated pressure wave activity were the most influential variables in the ANN(-) and ANN(+) programs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ANNs represent a potentially important tool that can be used to improve the classification and diagnosis of primary oesophageal motility disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00365520500234030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pattern recognition techniques, including ANNs, are powerful mathematical models that can handle large data sets and classify data into groups according to nonlinear statistical analysis.

    “Pattern recognition techniques, including artificial neural networks (ANNs), are powerful mathematical models which can handle large data sets and classify data into groups according to nonlinear statistical analysis.9-11”
  • ANNs have been used to analyze voice and swallow events, differentiating between normal and disordered events, as well as distinguishing among different types of disorders.

    “ANNs have been used to analyze voice and swallow events, differentiating between normal and disordered events, as well as distinguishing among different types of disorders.9-12”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 10

Authors
Santos, R., Haack, H. G., Maddalena, D., Hansen, R. D., & Kellow, J. E.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kellow, John E.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2006-01
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
257-263
ISSN
  • 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7708
OpenAlex
W2150551580
Cited by
10
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research Institute
  • Bowel and Cancer Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial neural networks, esophageal motility disorders, esophageal manometry, achalasia, automated diagnosis
MeSH terms
Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Manometry, Middle Aged, Peristalsis, Pressure, Esophageal Motility Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review