Cited by 49Plant and animal studiesInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The effect of climatic variation on abundance and diversity of bumblebees: a ten years survey in a mountain hotspot

Open access
Iserbyt, Stéphanie, Rasmont, Pierre·2012·Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.)

Abstract

Even if climates play an evident role in the bumblebees distribution, at the present time, no research has been performed to test whether climatic parameters actually affect their abundance and diversity. For more than one decade (1999–2009), we monitored the bumblebee fauna of a mountain hotspot in the Eastern Pyrenees. We sampled each year, in July, the same hayfield habitat, resulting in the sampling of 28 species. We computed the correlation of the yearly abundance of the main species with several climatic parameters concerning temperature and precipitation. We separated the parameters measured during the bumblebee solitary phase and those measured during their social phase. Bumblebee fauna composition varied significantly over years. In the 13 species considered, the abundance of 9 was correlated with at least one climatic parameter. The lowest abundance of bumblebees was correlated with hot and dry conditions during the month of August the year before sampling (the nuptial time of the founders). The highest overall abundance of bumblebees was observed during the social phase in the rainy months. Across years, climatic parameters seem to have strongly affected the composition of bumblebee fauna. Our results seem to indicate that hot and dry weather represent serious threat for most bumblebee species. The potential effects of Global Warming are discussed: they may cause a severe reduction of the mountain bumblebee diversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00379271.2012.10697775

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Dennis R. L. H. 1993. Butterfl ies and climate change. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
  2. Goulson D., Lye G. C., Darvill B. 2008a. Decline and conservation of bumblebees. Annual review of entomology 53: 191-208.
  3. Heinrich B. 1979. Bumblebee economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA.
  4. Legendre P., Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Second English edition, Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam.
  5. Rasmont P. 1989. Centres de richesse et centres de pauvreté de la faune des Bourdons de France (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Th éorie d'Inouye contre théorie de Ranta & Vepsäläinen, p. 215-225 in: de Beaufort J., Maurin H. (eds.). L'utilisation des Inventaires informatisés d'Invertébrés pour l'Identifi cation et la Surveillance d'Espaces de grand Intérêt faunistique. Secrétariat de la Faune et de la Flore, Paris.
  6. Rasmont P., Durieux E.-A., Iserbyt S., Baracetti M. 2000. Why are there so many bumblebees species in Eyne (France, Pyrénées-Orientales, Cerdagne)? p. 83-92 in: Sommeijer M. J., de Ruijter A. (eds). Proceedings of the fi rst Specialists'Meeting on "Insect Pollination in Greenhouses", Universiteit Utrecht, Soesterberg.
  7. Rasmont P., Ebmer A., Banaszak J., Zanden G. van der 1995. Hymenoptera Apoidea Gallica. Liste taxonomique des abeilles de France, de Belgique, de Suisse et du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 100: 1-98.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iserbyt, S., & Rasmont, P.
Affiliations
University of Mons (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Iserbyt, Stéphanie
  • Rasmont, Pierre
Venue
Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.)
Published
2012-01
Volume
48
Issue
3-4
Pages
261-273
ISSN
  • 0037-9271 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6351
OpenAlex
W2161012313
Cited by
49
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N S ) (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi UMONS (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
bumblebees, climate variability, species abundance, species diversity, temperature, precipitation, hayfields, Eastern Pyrenees, global warming, pollinator decline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review