Cited by 39Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of organic matter and chemical fertilizers on the degradation of benthiocarb and mcpa herbicides in the soil

Duah-Yentumi, Stephen, Kuwatsuka, Shozo·1980·Soil Science and Plant Nutrition

Abstract

The degradation of herbicides in soils amended with rice straw, compost and NPK chemical fertilizers was investigated in the laboratory under upland, oxidative-flooded (aerobic-flooded) and reductive-flooded (anaerobic-flooded) conditions using 14C-benthiocarb and 14C-MCPA labelled at the phenyl ring. Rice straw, compost and NPK amendments promoted the degradation of these herbicides under upland and oxidative-flooded conditions and large amounts of 14CO2 were evolved. Under reductive-flooded conditions, the degradation of the herbicides was remarkably slow and the various soil amendments had practically no effect on the degradation of the two herbicides. 4-Chlorobenzoic acid, desethylbenthiocarb, benthiocarb sulfoxide and 4-chlorobenzyl methyl sulfone were found to be the major degradation products of benthiocarb. Rice straw amendments appeared to increase the amount of benthiocarb sulfoxide but the amount of desethylbenthiocarb was reduced by both rice straw and compost, especially under upland conditions. 4-Chloro-2-methylphenol, which was the major degradation product of MCPA, was produced in relatively large amounts in the rice straw amendment under oxidative-flooded conditions and in the NPK amendment under upland conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00380768.1980.10431241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bollag J.M., 1967, Appl. Microbiol., 15, 1393, 10.1128/AEM.15.6.1393-1398.1967 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/00380768.1974.10432607 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/jf60218a008 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/00010694-197806000-00002 · DOI
  5. 10.1584/jpestics.2.7 · DOI
  6. Oyama H., 1978, Fourth International Congress of Pesticide Chemistry (IUPAC), Zurich, July
  7. 10.1584/jpestics.5.495 · DOI
  8. Rankov V., 1977, Soil Biology and Conservation of the Biosphere, 74

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 39

Metadata

Authors
Duah-Yentumi, S., & Kuwatsuka, S.
Affiliations
Nagoya University (JP)
Venue
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Published
1980-12
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
541-549
ISSN
  • 0038-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0765
OpenAlex
W2110674702
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Science & Plant Nutrition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
benthiocarb, MCPA, herbicide degradation, organic amendments, rice straw, compost, NPK fertilizer, flooded soil, upland soil, anaerobic conditions, oxidative conditions, 14C-labeled herbicide, degradation products, 4-chlorobenzoic acid, soil amendment effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review