The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Coming Illiberal Order
Abstract
The new international order will be marked by the ascendancy of illiberal states and value systems, and a diminishment of American influence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The occupation of Iraq in 2003, and the United States' military involvement in Afghanistan in the aftermath of the September 11 (9/11) attacks, epitomized the excessive self-confidence of American decision makers in promoting liberal democratic order. 4”
From Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cited by
Casarões, G., & Farias, D. B. L. (2021) · Cambridge Review of International Affairs · doi:10.1080/09557571.2021.1981248 · Cited by 148
“His illiberal platform is situated in a wave of right-wing authoritarian populists which are seen as a threat to liberal norms and values (Boyle 2016; Ikenberry 2018; Lake et al. 2021).”
BackgroundConservative soft power: liberal soft power bias and the ‘hidden’ attraction of Russia
Keating, V. C., & Kaczmarska, K. (2017) · Journal of International Relations and Development · doi:10.1057/s41268-017-0100-6 · Cited by 129
Contestation in a World of Liberal Orders
Goddard, S. E., Krebs, R. R., Kreuder‐Sonnen, C., & Rittberger, B. (2024) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksae026 · Cited by 114
A Flawed Framework: Why the Liberal International Order Concept Is Misguided
Glaser, C. L. (2019) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00343 · Cited by 84
Introduction to special issue: The study of populism in international relations
Löfflmann, G. (2022) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/13691481221103116 · Cited by 76
“…liberal international order and the functioning of key institutions and organisations, from continued EU integration to the survival of NATO, potentially signalling a return of great power politics in the 21st century marked by competing spheres of influence (Boyle, 2016; Schrank, 2017).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyle, M. J.
- Corresponding author
- Boyle, Michael J.
- ORCID
- Boyle, Michael J.
- Venue
- Survival
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-03-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 35-66
- ISSN
- 0039-6338 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2699
- OpenAlex
- W2297798669
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 33.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Survival (publishedVersion)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- illiberalism, international order, United States influence, great power politics, value systems, liberal international order, geopolitics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
