The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Some Control Chart Procedures
Abstract
This paper unifies and extends previously published characterizations of moving average, geometric moving average, and cumulative sum control chart procedures. It presents comparable characterizations of two procedures based on tests described but not evaluated in earlier papers. One of these procedures is based on a test devised by Girshick and Rubin that is optimal under a particular set of idealized conditions. The other procedure is based on run sum tests, which are generalizations of the type of run test that counts the number of consecutive points that exceed a limit, the generalization taking into account the extent that points in such a run exceed the limit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PAGE, E. S. (1954) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100 · Cited by 5,739
Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product.
Hotelling, H., & Shewhart, W. A. (1932) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2277676 · Cited by 3,070
Control Chart Tests Based on Geometric Moving Averages
Roberts, S. W. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271439 · Cited by 1,251
Self-citationEconomic control of quality of manufactured product
Elkinton, H. W. (1932) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/s0016-0032(32)91043-6 · Cited by 1,247
Control Chart Tests Based on Geometric Moving Averages
Roberts, S. W. (1959) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1266443 · Cited by 490
Self-citationControl Charts and Stochastic Processes
Barnard, G. A. (1959) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1959.tb00336.x · Cited by 477
A Bayes Approach to a Quality Control Model
Girshick, M. A., & Rubin, H. (1952) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729489 · Cited by 366
CONTROL CHARTS WITH WARNING LINES
PAGE, E. S. (1955) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/42.1-2.243 · Cited by 224
Sampling inspection of continuous processes with no autocorrelation between successive results
EWAN, W. D., & KEMP, K. W. (1960) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/47.3-4.363 · Cited by 215
Properties of Control Chart Zone Tests
Roberts, S. W. (1958) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1958.tb03870.x · Cited by 115
Self-citation
Cited by
Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Application
Riedel, K. S. (1994) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1994.10485821 · Cited by 3,518
Sequential Changepoint Detection in Quality Control and Dynamical Systems
Lai, T. L. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02052.x · Cited by 580
Feng, J., Phillips, R. V., Malenica, I., Bishara, A., Hubbard, A. E., Celi, L. A., & Pirracchio, R. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00611-y · Cited by 423
Löfqvist, C. (2006) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.124.12.1711 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, S. W.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1966-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-430
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2009074175
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Some Control Chart Procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1966.10490374
- The paper
- Roberts, S. W. (1966). A Comparison of Some Control Chart Procedures. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1966.10490374
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
