Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 919

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for Normality

Filliben, James J.·1975·Technometrics

Abstract

This paper introdLlces the normal probability plot correlation coefficient as a test statistic in complete samples for the composite hypothesis of normality. The proposed test statistic is conceptnally simple, is compntationally convenient, and is readily extendible to testing non-normal distributional hypotheses. An empirical power strldy shows that the normal probability plot correlation coefficient, compares favorably with 7 other normal test statistics. Percent points are tabulated for n = 3(l)50(5)100.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00401706.1975.10489279

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 919

Metadata

Authors
Filliben, J. J.
Venue
Technometrics
Published
1975-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
111-117
ISSN
  • 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2723
OpenAlex
W2048265032
Cited by
919
References
3
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for Normality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1975.10489279
The paper
Filliben, J. J. (1975). The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for Normality. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1975.10489279

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.