Cited by 630Bone health and osteoporosis researchRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesBone Metabolism and Diseases

Generalised bone loss in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

GOUGH, A·1994·The Lancet

Abstract

Generalised osteoporosis is a feature of established rheumatoid arthritis but whether this is a consequence of treatment, immobility, or disease activity has been unclear. We estimated bone mineral density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry on 148 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis before treatment with corticosteroids or disease-modifying drugs and 730 normal controls. Scans were done at 12-month intervals in patients and at 0 and 12 months on 50 of the controls matched for menopausal status. At presentation, bone mineral density of patients did not differ from controls. However, patients with disease for less than 6 months had significantly higher spinal bone mineral density than those of longer duration. Over the next 12 months, bone mineral density loss was greater in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls; significantly so for early disease (eg, -2.4 [0.8] vs -0.6 [0.4] g/cm2, p < 0.05 in the spine and -4.3 [0.8] vs -0.4 [0.5] g/cm2, p < 0.001 in the trochanter). For the lumbar spine, only disease activity was significantly associated with this bone mineral density loss. For patients with active disease over 2 years, mean bone mineral density loss at each site was between 5.5 and 10% (p < 0.01 compared to patients with inactive disease). Suppression of disease activity stabilised this bone loss. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis significant amounts of generalised skeletal bone were lost early in the disease and the loss was associated with disease activity. These findings have implications for the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and possibly other inflammatory diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91049-9

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOUGH, A.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
GOUGH, A
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-07
Volume
344
Issue
8914
Pages
23-27
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2086103128
Cited by
630
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 42
FWCI
15.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, early rheumatoid arthritis, bone mineral density, bone loss, osteoporosis, disease activity, disease duration, spinal bone mineral density, disease-modifying drugs, corticosteroids, immobility
MeSH terms
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Osteoporosis, Prospective Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Premenopause, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review