The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quick and Easy Analysis of Unreplicated Factorials
Abstract
Box and Meyer (1986) introduced a method for assessing the sizes of contrasts in unreplicated factorial and fractional factorial designs. This is a useful technique, and an associated graphical display popularly known as a Bayes plot makes it even more effective. This article presents a competing technique that is also effective and is computationally simple. An advantage of the new method is that the results are given in terms of the original units of measurement. This direct association with the data may make the analysis easier to explain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Addelman, S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1979.10489788 · Cited by 6,750
Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments.
Freeman, H. A., Davies, O. L., Box, G. E. P., Connor, L. R., Cousins, W. R., Davies, O. L., Himsworth, F. R., & Sillitto, G. P. (1955) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280981 · Cited by 933
Use of Half-Normal Plots in Interpreting Factorial Two-Level Experiments
Daniel, C. (1959) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1959.10489866 · Cited by 798
An Analysis for Unreplicated Fractional Factorials
Box, G. E. P., & Meyer, R. D. (1986) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1986.10488093 · Cited by 576
Analysis of Means—A Graphical Procedure
Ott, E. R. (1983) · Journal of Quality Technology · doi:10.1080/00224065.1983.11978836 · Cited by 114
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.2307/1266715 · doi:10.2307/1266715
- Ott E. R., 1967, Industrial Quality Control, 24, 101
- Taguchi G., 1980, Introduction to Off-Line Quality Control
Cited by
Guidance for robustness/ruggedness tests in method validation
Vander Heyden, Y., Nijhuis, A., Smeyers-Verbeke, J., Vandeginste, B. G. M., & Massart, D. L. (2001) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0731-7085(00)00529-x · Cited by 639
D-optimal design of split-split-plot experiments
Jones, B., & Goos, P. (2009) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asn070 · Cited by 47
Tan, M. H. Y., & Jeff Wu, C. F. (2013) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2013.778790 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenth, R. V.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 469-473
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2120637011
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quick and Easy Analysis of Unreplicated Factorials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1989.10488595
- The paper
- Lenth, R. V. (1989). Quick and Easy Analysis of Unreplicated Factorials. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1989.10488595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
