Cultivating student agency through teachers’ professional learning
Abstract
Thoughtfully planned professional development (PD) that fosters teacher agency has the potential to impact student agency in the literacy classroom. Drawing on a body of research with 82 teachers across multiple schools and clinical settings, this article first presents findings from a variety of PD contexts that are synthesized to highlight four guiding principles for designing professional learning that encourages both teacher and student agency. Then, the article illustrates one vignette of agentive literacy teaching, which was subsequently facilitative of students’ agentic engagement with vocabulary learning. Throughout, the case is made that intentional and embedded opportunities for co-construction of knowledge and reciprocity between PD providers and teachers, teachers and leadership, and teachers and students are important ingredients for an agentic learning experience. Finally, conclusions are drawn emphasizing that teacher and student agency are forces of empowerment, critical to student and teacher well-being.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The extent to which teachers can exercise agency (e.g., autonomy, intentionality, and professional judgement) over their own professional learning is an influence on professional development.
“Another influence is the extent to which teachers can exercise agency (e.g., autonomy, intentionality, and professional judgement) over their own professional learning (Brodie, 2021;McChesney & Aldridge, 2021;Robertson et al., 2019).”
From Exploring the role of instructional leaders in promoting agency in teachers’ professional learning (2024) · cites this paper as Robertson et al., 2019
Cites
Reflectivity in Research Practice: An Overview of Different Perspectives
Mortari, L. (2015) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406915618045 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chiu, T. K. F. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1926289 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Exploring the role of instructional leaders in promoting agency in teachers’ professional learning
Robertson, D. A., Padesky, L. B., Thrailkill, L. “., Kelly, A., & Brock, C. H. (2024) · International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning · doi:10.30935/ijpdll/14058 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…experiences (Snow, 2015), the “ embedded ” teacher leaders for this team, as opposed to the principal or coach or external partners, seemed to provide space for a more horizontal distribution of expertise (Robertson et al., 2020) as Natalie and Amanda facilitated both planning and reflection.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Robertson, D. A., Padesky, L. B., & Brock, C. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Corresponding author
- Robertson, Dana A.
- Venue
- Theory Into Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-02-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-201
- ISSN
- 0040-5841 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-0421
- OpenAlex
- W2996521736
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theory Into Practice (publishedVersion)
- VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
- Keywords
- student agency, teacher agency, teacher learning, professional development design, literacy education, vocabulary acquisition, co-construction of knowledge, teacher well-being, student engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review