The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification
Abstract
Gentrification involves the transition of inner-city neighbourhoods from a status of relative poverty and limited property investment to a state of commodification and reinvestment. This paper reconsiders the role of artists as agents, and aestheticisation as a process, in contributing to gentrification, an argument illustrated with empirical data from Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. Because some poverty neighbourhoods may be candidates for occupation by artists, who value their afford ability and mundane, off-centre status, the study also considers the movement of districts from a position of high cultural capital and low economic capital to a position of steadily rising economic capital. The paper makes extensive use of Bourdieu's conceptualisation of the field of cultural production, including his discussion of the uneasy relations of economic and cultural capitals, the power of the aesthetic disposition to valorise the mundane and the appropriation of cultural capital by market forces. Bourdieu's thinking is extended to the field of gentrification in an account that interprets the enhanced valuation of cultural capital since the 1960s, encouraging spatial proximity by other professionals to the inner-city habitus of the artist. This approach offers some reconciliation to theoretical debates in the gentrification literature about the roles of structure and agency and economic and cultural explanations. It also casts a more critical historical perspective on current writing lauding the rise of the cultural economy and the creative city.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CONSUMING AUTHENTICITY: From outposts of difference to means of exclusion
Zukin, S. (2008) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502380802245985 · Cited by 459
Seeing the street through Instagram. Digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification
Bronsvoort, I., & Uitermark, J. L. (2022) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/00420980211046539 · Cited by 60
The mutual shaping of geomedia and gentrification: The case of alternative tourism apps
Jansson, A. (2019) · Communication and the Public · doi:10.1177/2057047319850197 · Cited by 40
From the Tag to the #Hashtag: Street Art, Instagram, and Gentrification
Polson, E. (2024) · Space and Culture · doi:10.1177/12063312221090608 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Ley, D.
- Venue
- Urban Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2527-2544
- ISSN
- 0042-0980 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-063X
- OpenAlex
- W2112804145
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 63.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0042098032000136192
- The paper
- Ley, D. (2003). Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.