The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity
Abstract
This paper draws on institutionalist approaches as developed in the fields of policy analysis and planning, to develop a methodological approach for assessing how the governance capacity for socially innovative action might emerge. After introducing the problematic of the search for governance relations which have the capacity for social innovation, the second and third parts of the paper summarise the emerging social-constructivist 'institutionalist' approach in policy analysis and planning. The fourth part draws on a three-level analytical model of governance dynamics to explore the dynamics and dialectics of urban governance transformation processes, illustrated with a case study of a socially innovative area-based initiative. The final section considers the power dynamics of episodes of socially innovative governance arising from within civil society and their potential to transform wider governance processes and cultures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
(2021) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132519898786 · Cited by 1,846
RetractedPowers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,828
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x · Cited by 6,796
From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism
Harvey, D. (1989) · Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography · doi:10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583 · Cited by 5,449
The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process
Hajer, M. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/019829333x.001.0001 · Cited by 4,184
Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies
Healey, P. (2006) · doi:10.25405/ncl.34571748.v1 · Cited by 2,484
Self-citationHealey, P. (1997) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2 · Cited by 2,232
Self-citationThe Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning
(1993) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822381815 · Cited by 1,992
Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism
Peters, G. B. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,860
Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices
Fischer, F. (2003) · doi:10.1093/019924264x.001.0001 · Cited by 1,821
Metadata
- Authors
- González, S., & Healey, P.
- Venue
- Urban Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2055-2069
- ISSN
- 0042-0980 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-063X
- OpenAlex
- W2123448714
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 51.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00420980500279778
- The paper
- González, S., & Healey, P. (2005). A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279778
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.