The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sense of Community and Neighbourhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism
Abstract
New urbanism, an umbrella term which encompasses 'neotraditional development' as well as 'traditional neighbourhood design', lives by an unswerving belief in the ability of the built environment to create a 'sense of community'. The purpose of this paper is to assess whether the social doctrine of new urbanism can be successfully supported or at least integrated with the social science literature which deals with the question of community formation. Towards this goal, the paper first delineates the social doctrine of new urbanism, and then discusses the conceptual frameworks and empirical findings that either support or contradict the idea that a sense of community will follow the physical form of cities and neighbourhoods generally and new urbanist principles specifically. After laying this groundwork, the remainder of the paper presents an assessment of whether a reconciliation between research and doctrine may be possible, in light of various apparent contradictions between the social claims of new urbanists and the results of research by social scientists. It is concluded that new urbanists need to clarify the meaning of sense of community as it pertains to physical design. Further, it is maintained that while some research supports the idea that resident interaction and sense of community are related to environmental factors, the effectuation of this goal is usually only achieved via some intermediate variable. This latter point leaves open the question of whether any number of other design creeds could produce the same result via a different design philosophy. The need for further research is stressed; this should be focused on investigating the issue more directly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.417 · Cited by 1,920
Designing a Liveable Compact City: Physical Forms of City and Social Life in Urban Neighbourhoods
Raman, S. (2010) · Built Environment · doi:10.2148/benv.36.1.63 · Cited by 145
Burgoine, T., Jones, A. P., Namenek Brouwer, R. J., & Benjamin Neelon, S. E. (2015) · International Journal of Health Geographics · doi:10.1186/1476-072x-14-8 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Talen, E.
- Venue
- Urban Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1361-1379
- ISSN
- 0042-0980 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-063X
- OpenAlex
- W2118376313
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sense of Community and Neighbourhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0042098993033
- The paper
- Talen, E. (1999). Sense of Community and Neighbourhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.