Cited by 81Urban Transport and AccessibilityObesity, Physical Activity, DietUrban Green Space and Health

Associations between BMI and home, school and route environmental exposures estimated using GPS and GIS: do we see evidence of selective daily mobility bias in children?

Open access
Burgoine, Thomas, Jones, Andy P, Namenek Brouwer, Rebecca J, Benjamin Neelon, Sara E·2015·International Journal of Health Geographics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined whether objective measures of food, physical activity and built environment exposures, in home and non-home settings, contribute to children's body weight. Further, comparing GPS and GIS measures of environmental exposures along routes to and from school, we tested for evidence of selective daily mobility bias when using GPS data. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional analysis, using objective assessments of body weight in relation to multiple environmental exposures. Data presented are from a sample of 94 school-aged children, aged 5-11 years. Children's heights and weights were measured by trained researchers, and used to calculate BMI z-scores. Participants wore a GPS device for one full week. Environmental exposures were estimated within home and school neighbourhoods, and along GIS (modelled) and GPS (actual) routes from home to school. We directly compared associations between BMI and GIS-modelled versus GPS-derived environmental exposures. The study was conducted in Mebane and Mount Airy, North Carolina, USA, in 2011. RESULTS: In adjusted regression models, greater school walkability was associated with significantly lower mean BMI. Greater home walkability was associated with increased BMI, as was greater school access to green space. Adjusted associations between BMI and route exposure characteristics were null. The use of GPS-actual route exposures did not appear to confound associations between environmental exposures and BMI in this sample. CONCLUSIONS: This study found few associations between environmental exposures in home, school and commuting domains and body weight in children. However, walkability of the school neighbourhood may be important. Of the other significant associations observed, some were in unexpected directions. Importantly, we found no evidence of selective daily mobility bias in this sample, although our study design is in need of replication in a free-living adult sample.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1476-072x-14-8

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgoine, T., Jones, A. P., Namenek Brouwer, R. J., & Benjamin Neelon, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Burgoine, Thomas
Venue
International Journal of Health Geographics
Published
2015
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
8
ISSN
1476-072X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166203861
Cited by
81
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Health Geographics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust
  • United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Centre for Diet and Activity Research
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023187/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007462/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
childhood obesity, body mass index, built environment, green space access, GIS-based modeling, children's mobility, food environment, physical activity environment
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, North Carolina, Students, Body Mass Index, Geographic Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review