Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘We don't talk about Çatalhöyük, we live it’: sustainable archaeological practice through community-based participatory research

Atalay, Sonya·2010·World Archaeology

Abstract

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) provides a methodology for engaging descendent and local communities as partners in archaeological research. This article, based on a five-year comparative research project that examines CBPR's application to archaeology, demonstrates a collaborative model that involves reciprocity, is action based and aims to build community capacity while engaging communities in the process of archaeological research and heritage management. Included are details of what community-based participatory research is, the main principles involved in its practice and a demonstration of how it is being effectively applied ‘on-the-ground’ at Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Two components of the Çatalhöyük CBPR project are highlighted: the community internship program and the archaeological community theatre project.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438243.2010.497394

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1007/s11759-007-9026-8 · DOI
  2. Atalay S., 2008, Collaborating at the Trowel's Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology, 123
  3. 10.1558/jmea.v12i1.91 · DOI
  4. Bartu A., 2000, Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük
  5. Colwell-Chanthaphonh C., 2008, Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities
  6. Fortmann L., 2008, Participatory Research in Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Doing Science Together, 1
  7. Freire P., 1970, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
  8. 10.2307/278113 · DOI
  9. Gaventa J., 1988, Convergence, 21, 19
  10. Gaventa J., 1993, Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada, 21
  11. Hodder I., 1996, On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95
  12. Hodder I., 2006, Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Themes from the 1995–99 Seasons
  13. Hodder I., 2009, Cosmopolitan Archaeologies, 184, 10.1215/9780822392422-009 · DOI
  14. 10.1179/175355309X457196 · DOI
  15. Horton M., 1990, The Long Haul: An Autobiography
  16. Kassam Y., 1979, Participatory Research: An Emerging Alternative Methodology in Social Science Research
  17. Maguire P., 1987, Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach
  18. Matthews W., 1996, On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95
  19. Mellaart J., 1967, Çatal Höyük: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia
  20. Minkler M., 2008, Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes
  21. Pyburn A., 2003, Archaeologists and Local Communities: Partners in Exploring the Past, 167
  22. Pyburn A., 2010, Global Public Archaeology
  23. Sabloff J., 2008, Archaeology Matters: Action Archaeology in the Modern World
  24. Sangtin Writers, 2006, Playing with Fire: Feminist Thought and Activism through Seven Lives in India
  25. Shankland D., 1996, On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95
  26. Shankland D., 1999, Archaeology and Folklore, 139
  27. Strand K. J., 2003, Community-based Research and Higher Education: Principles and Practices
  28. Tax S., 1958, Human Organization, 17, 17, 10.17730/humo.17.1.b1gtr520r323687t · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Atalay, S.
Venue
World Archaeology
Published
2010-09
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
418-429
ISSN
  • 0043-8243
  • 1470-1375
Cited by
72
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review