The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interfacing archaeology and the world of citizen sensors: exploring the impact of neogeography and volunteered geographic information on an authenticated archaeology
Abstract
Emerging out of Web 2.0 there have been almost breath-taking technological advances in the geospatial web spurred on by developments in neogeography and the inter-connectivity provided by published open-source application programming interfaces. In addition, the greater availability of location-intelligent devices, social media technologies and the advent of volunteered geographic information promises to further revolutionize traditionally conceived geospatial technologies and empower a world of spatially aware citizen sensors. Together, these new Web 2.0 geospatial platforms and citizen-generated geotagged media pose significant opportunities and challenges to the traditional geospatial framework of GIS and standards-based spatial databases, and to archaeology. The new Web 2.0 geospatial capabilities enable communities of stakeholders and interest groups to contribute, participate, and draw upon spatial data and mapping services formerly in the domain of expert geospatial and archaeological communities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These developments are highlighting concerns over data governance in archaeology, including the ownership of data and control over what happens with data, issues of data quality, authority and accessibility, which in turn, present challenges and opportunities for archaeologists in the geospatial web (Harris 2012).”
From What We See, What We Don’t See: Data Governance, Archaeological Spatial Databases and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in an Age of Big Data (2020) · cites this paper as Harris 2012
Citations
Cites
Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology
Conolly, J., & Lake, M. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807459 · Cited by 761
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Bodenhamer D. J., 2010, The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship, 10.2979/5864.0 · DOI
- Chapman H., 2006, Landscape Archaeology and GIS
- Cope , M. and Elwood , S. 2010 . “Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach” . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage . · DOI
- Craglia , M. 13–14 December 2007 . “ SDI and VGI: parallel universes? Workshop on Volunteered Geographic Information ” . 13–14 December , Available at: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/docs/present/Craglia_vgi.pdf
- Craglia M., 2003, URISA Journal, 15, 51
- Craig W. J., 2002, Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, 10.1201/9780203469484 · DOI
- Elliott T., 2009, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 3
- Goodchild , M. F. 2007 . “ Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography ” . Available at: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/docs/position/Goodchild_VGI2007.pdf · DOI
- Goodchild M. F., 2004, Spatially Integrated Social Science, 10.1093/oso/9780195152708.001.0001 · DOI
- Guptill S. C., 1999, Geographical Information Systems, 677
- 10.1002/9780470689813 · DOI
- Kansa E. C., 2011, Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfgw · DOI
- Longley P. A., 2011, Geographic Information Systems and Science
- Mehrer M. W., 2006, GIS and Archaeological Site Location Modelling
- Moeller J. J., 2010, Manual of Geospatial Science and Technology,, 733, 10.1201/9781420087345-c37 · DOI
- Peng Z., 2003, Internet GIS: Distributed Geographic Information Services for the Internet and Wireless Networks
- Pickles J., 1995, The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems
- Rhind D., 1997, Framework for the World
- Rouse L. J., 2007, The Geospatial Web: How Geo-Browsers, Social Software and the Web 2.0 Are Shaping the Network Society
- Salge F., 1999, Geographical Information Systems, 693
- Sui D., 2012, Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice.
- Tulloch D. L., 2008, The Handbook of Geographic Information Science, 447
- Turner A., 2006, Introduction to Neogeography
- Weiner D., 2007, Handbook of Geographic Information Science
- Westcott K. L., 2002, Practical Applications of GIS for Archaeologists: A Predictive Modeling Toolkit
- 10.4324/9780203302392 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Álvarez Larrain, A., & McCall, M. K. (2019) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-018-9385-z · Cited by 89
Gupta, N., Blair, S., & Nicholas, R. (2020) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2020.1713969 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, T. M.
- Venue
- World Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 580-591
- ISSN
- 0043-8243
- 1470-1375
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
