Cited by 313Cognitive Abilities and TestingCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

RETRACTED: Parasite prevalence and the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability

Open access
Eppig, Christopher, Fincher, Corey L., Thornhill, Randy·2010·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

In this study, we hypothesize that the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability is determined in part by variation in the intensity of infectious diseases. From an energetics standpoint, a developing human will have difficulty building a brain and fighting off infectious diseases at the same time, as both are very metabolically costly tasks. Using three measures of average national intelligence quotient (IQ), we found that the zero-order correlation between average IQ and parasite stress ranges from r = −0.76 to r = −0.82 ( p < 0.0001). These correlations are robust worldwide, as well as within five of six world regions. Infectious disease remains the most powerful predictor of average national IQ when temperature, distance from Africa, gross domestic product per capita and several measures of education are controlled for. These findings suggest that the Flynn effect may be caused in part by the decrease in the intensity of infectious diseases as nations develop.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2010.0973This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General cognitive ability is reduced developmentally by parasite stress as a result of a trade-off between investing in general cognitive functioning and immune functioning.

    “Eppig et al. (2010) recently argued that general cognitive ability is reduced developmentally by parasite stress as a result of a trade-off between investing in two bioenergetically demanding domains: general cognitive functioning and immune functioning.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eppig, C., Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2010-06-30
Volume
277
Issue
1701
Pages
3801-3808
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2149066259
Cited by
313
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 52
FWCI
41.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
parasite stress, cognitive ability, Flynn effect, gross domestic product, temperature
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Communicable Diseases, Education, Humans, Intelligence, Parasites, Temperature, Prevalence, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review