The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do You Know What It Means to Miss New Orleans? Internet Communication, Geographic Community, and Social Capital in Crisis
Abstract
This study investigated Internet communication and use in a crisis situation, Hurricane Katrina, to explore the role of the Internet in supporting or diminishing geographically-based community during a crisis. The researchers conducted an online survey of Internet users (n=1192) from the dispersed metropolitan New Orleans area. The survey focused on amount, type, function, and importance of Internet use to creating and maintaining social capital, supporting geographically-based communities, activating social networks, reducing uncertainty, and achieving both expressive and instrumental communication goals. The results indicated that Internet users in a crisis situation went online to seek interactive fora specific to their neighborhoods and to activate weak ties in their social networks. They engaged in more uncertainty reduction behavior when experiencing higher degrees of damage. They turned to the Internet in place of other media as a result of disruptions caused by the crisis. Women valued online expressive communication more than men did. The findings suggest that social capital theorists would benefit from a communication perspective on the Internet. The study also led to the formation of suggestions for emergency preparedness agencies, shelter providers, crisis victims, and online news providers that can improve emergency response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
BERGER, C. R., & CALABRESE, R. J. (1975) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x · Cited by 3,006
Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet: Reconciling Conflicting Findings
NIE, N. H. (2001) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027640121957277 · Cited by 803
Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts
Rice, R. E., & Katz, J. E. (2003) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/s0308-5961(03)00068-5 · Cited by 593
Cited by
Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., Turner McGowen, S. E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J. A., et al. (2015) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/disa.12092 · Cited by 869
A work-in-process literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication
Veil, S. R., Buehner, T., & Palenchar, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.x · Cited by 677
Jurgens, M., & Helsloot, I. (2018) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12212 · Cited by 139
The Role of Social Media in International Tourist’s Decision Making
Schroeder, A., & Pennington-Gray, L. (2015) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287514528284 · Cited by 119
Communicating crisis uncertainty: A review of the knowledge gaps
Liu, B. F., Bartz, L., & Duke, N. (2016) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.003 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Procopio, C. H., & Procopio, S. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Communication Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-87
- ISSN
- 0090-9882 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-5752
- OpenAlex
- W1966598338
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 34.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.