The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advertising Repetition as a Signal of Quality: If It's Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong
Abstract
The author proposes that consumers infer brand quality from the level of advertising repetition for unfamiliar brands. Consumers are posited to associate high product quality with high levels of repetition because they see repetition as costly and think higher costs reflect the manufacturer's commitment to the product. However, at very high levels of repetition, consumers may perceive the expenditures as excessive and begin to doubt the manufacturer's confidence in product quality, which would lead to an inverted-U relationship between advertising repetition and product quality perceptions. The author demonstrates that the relationship between repetition and perceived brand quality is mediated by perceptions of the manufacturer's effort and confidence in quality rather than by irritation or boredom. The hypotheses were tested in an experiment in which the level of repetition and the color of the ad were varied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209380 · Cited by 3,811
Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97 · Cited by 813
Cited by
Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21001 · Cited by 809
Atkinson, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2014) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.834803 · Cited by 620
Managing Images in Different Cultures: A Cross-National Study of Color Meanings and Preferences
Madden, T. J., Hewett, K., & Roth, M. S. (2000) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jimk.8.4.90.19795 · Cited by 607
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000085 · Cited by 389
Advertising Repetition: A Meta-Analysis on Effective Frequency in Advertising
Schmidt, S., & Eisend, M. (2015) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1018460 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirmani, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 77-86
- ISSN
- 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7805
- OpenAlex
- W1997374184
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advertising Repetition as a Signal of Quality: If It's Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00913367.1997.10673530
- The paper
- Kirmani, A. (1997). Advertising Repetition as a Signal of Quality: If It's Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong. Journal of Advertising. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1997.10673530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.