Cited by 308Marketing and Advertising StrategiesConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceDigital Marketing and Social Media

Advertising Repetition: A Meta-Analysis on Effective Frequency in Advertising

Schmidt, Susanne, Eisend, Martin·2015·Journal of Advertising

Abstract

This study uses meta-analytic techniques to examine the number of exposures that maximize consumer response to an ad. The results show that in an experimental setting maximum attitude is reached at approximately ten exposures, while recall increases linearly and does not level off before the eighth exposure. The findings are of interest for two opposing schools of thought in the advertising literature on effective frequency. They support the repetitionists’ beliefs over the minimalists’ beliefs on the number of ad exposures needed for maximum consumer response. The study further investigates whether the repetition effects depend on contingent factors. Low involvement and spaced exposures enhance repetition effects on attitude toward the brand. Embedded advertising and massed exposures enhance the repetition effects on recall. Repetition effects decay over time for both attitude toward the brand and recall. The study provides important implications for researchers by contributing to the discussion on effective frequency and providing support for the repetitionists’ view. This view has implications for practitioners who try to optimize advertising frequency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00913367.2015.1018460

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Eisend, Martin (2014), “How Effective Is Advertising? A Meta-Meta-Analysis of Effect Sizes in Advertising Research,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Research in Advertising, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  2. 10.2307/3172516 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, S., & Eisend, M.
Affiliations
  • TU Dortmund University (DE)
  • European University Viadrina (DE)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Susanne
Venue
Journal of Advertising
Published
2015-03-25
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
415-428
ISSN
  • 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7805
OpenAlex
W1997972528
Cited by
308
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Advertising (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
advertising repetition, effective frequency, advertising exposure, brand attitude, memory retrieval, repetition effects, embedded advertising

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review