Cited by 216Psychological and Educational Research StudiesDigital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Managing the Power of Curiosity for Effective Web Advertising Strategies

Menon, Satya, Soman, Dilip·2002·Journal of Advertising

Abstract

This research investigates the effect of curiosity on the effectiveness of Internet advertising. In particular, we identify processes that underlie curiosity resolution and study its impact on consumer motivation and learning. The dataset from our simulated Internet experiment includes process tracking variables (i.e., clickstream data from ad-embedded links), traditional attitude and behavioral intention measures, and open-ended protocols. We find that a curiosity-generating advertising strategy increases interest and learning relative to a strategy that provides detailed product information. Furthermore, though curiosity does not dramatically increase the observed quantity of search in our study, it seems to improve the quality of search substantially (i.e., time spent and attention devoted to specific information), resulting in better and more focused memory and comprehension of new product information. To enhance the effectiveness of Internet advertising of new products, we recommend a curiosity advertising strategy based on four elements: (1) curiosity generation by highlighting a gap in extant knowledge, (2) the presence of a hint to guide elaboration for curiosity resolution, (3) sufficient time to try and resolve curiosity as well as the assurance of curiosity-resolving information, and (4) the use of measures of consumer elaboration and learning to gauge advertising effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00913367.2002.10673672

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Curiosity gaps increase consumer engagement in a range of contexts, including ad clicks and brand recall.

    “Prior research shows that curiosity gaps increase consumer engagement in a range of contexts, including ad clicks (Menon and Soman 2002) and brand recall (Fazio, Herr, and Powell 1992).”

    From Emotional Manipulation by AI Companions (2025) · cites this paper as Menon and Soman 2002

  • Minimal cues can spark curiosity and meaningfully increase engagement.

    “Prior research shows that minimal cues can spark curiosity and meaningfully increase engagement (Menon and Soman 2002).”

    From Emotional Manipulation by AI Companions (2025) · cites this paper as Menon and Soman 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menon, S., & Soman, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
Journal of Advertising
Published
2002-10
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7805
OpenAlex
W2020744307
Cited by
216
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Advertising (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
curiosity, online advertising, advertising effectiveness, consumer motivation, consumer learning, clickstream data, consumer search behavior, advertising strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review