Managing the Power of Curiosity for Effective Web Advertising Strategies
Abstract
This research investigates the effect of curiosity on the effectiveness of Internet advertising. In particular, we identify processes that underlie curiosity resolution and study its impact on consumer motivation and learning. The dataset from our simulated Internet experiment includes process tracking variables (i.e., clickstream data from ad-embedded links), traditional attitude and behavioral intention measures, and open-ended protocols. We find that a curiosity-generating advertising strategy increases interest and learning relative to a strategy that provides detailed product information. Furthermore, though curiosity does not dramatically increase the observed quantity of search in our study, it seems to improve the quality of search substantially (i.e., time spent and attention devoted to specific information), resulting in better and more focused memory and comprehension of new product information. To enhance the effectiveness of Internet advertising of new products, we recommend a curiosity advertising strategy based on four elements: (1) curiosity generation by highlighting a gap in extant knowledge, (2) the presence of a hint to guide elaboration for curiosity resolution, (3) sufficient time to try and resolve curiosity as well as the assurance of curiosity-resolving information, and (4) the use of measures of consumer elaboration and learning to gauge advertising effectiveness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Curiosity gaps increase consumer engagement in a range of contexts, including ad clicks and brand recall.
“Prior research shows that curiosity gaps increase consumer engagement in a range of contexts, including ad clicks (Menon and Soman 2002) and brand recall (Fazio, Herr, and Powell 1992).”
From Emotional Manipulation by AI Companions (2025) · cites this paper as Menon and Soman 2002
Minimal cues can spark curiosity and meaningfully increase engagement.
“Prior research shows that minimal cues can spark curiosity and meaningfully increase engagement (Menon and Soman 2002).”
From Emotional Manipulation by AI Companions (2025) · cites this paper as Menon and Soman 2002
Cites
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825 · see citing works
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726 · see citing works
The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation.
Loewenstein, G. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75 · Cited by 2,738 · cited 12× · see citing works
“In situations in which curiosity resolu tion results in the revelation of extant knowledge, Loewenstein (1994) suggests that the person gener ally feels disappointed with the actual information.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialConfirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094 · see citing works
Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?
Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150973 · Cited by 1,472 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shin, E., & Lee, J. E. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.022 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Emotional Manipulation by AI Companions
De Freitas, J., Oguz-Uguralp, Z., & Kaan-Uguralp, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19258 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Menon, S., & Soman, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- ORCID
- Soman, Dilip
- Venue
- Journal of Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7805
- OpenAlex
- W2020744307
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advertising (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- curiosity, online advertising, advertising effectiveness, consumer motivation, consumer learning, clickstream data, consumer search behavior, advertising strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review