Understanding Why Consumers Don't Skip Pre-Roll Video Ads
Abstract
Pre-roll advertising is a novel form of online video advertising that provides consumers with an option to skip after viewing a brief forced segment. Pre-roll ads are unique from other forms of online advertising because pre-roll ads play in exactly the space in which consumers are expecting to view their intended content. Such interruption and obstruction not only heightens consumer irritation but also causes attention-getting tactics, which are redundant in a highly attentive state, to backfire. For these reasons, existing ad avoidance literature may not adequately address this unique format. Employing a large industry data set of pre-roll ads representing multiple countries and product categories, we empirically examine skipping behavior using a broader range of ad characteristics than previous research. We propose that less complex affective ad characteristics increase skipping by failing to engage cognitive resources and therefore leaving cognitive resources available to experience irritation. We further posit that, in a pre-roll context, attention-getting ad characteristics are not only superfluous but actually increase the likelihood consumers recognize pre-roll content as advertising and skip. Our empirical findings support these assertions, identifying new factors driving ad avoidance, and calling into question the applicability of attention-getting advertising approaches in the novel pre-roll environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These techniques have shown an effective way to increase users' level of understanding and enable consciousness when interacting with the presented information.
“These techniques have shown an effective way to increase users’ level of understanding and enable consciousness when interacting with the presented information [19, 46].”
From Explainable recommendation: when design meets trust calibration (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
Cites
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646 · see citing works
The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209380 · Cited by 3,811 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consumers not only spend less time viewing content they know is advertising (Kim, Pasadeos, and Barban 2001; van Reijmersdal, Neijens, and Smit 2005) but also actively resist identified persuasive attempts (Campbell 1995; Campbell and Kirmani 2000; Darke and Ritchie 2007; Friestad and Wright 1994).”
BackgroundAnswers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106296642 · Cited by 3,608 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Following completion of this process, interrater consistency was assessed on a per-ad basis by calculating Pearson correlations (Gwet 2014; LeBreton and Senter 2008).”
MethodAutonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review
Kreibig, S. D. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010 · Cited by 3,188 · cited 3× · see citing works
“However, some of the best support for considering suspense or anxiety as a basic emotion comes from research occurring at the intersection of biology and psychology (Gray 1982; Kreibig 2010).”
BackgroundCampbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/314309 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Basic emotions, relations among emotions, and emotion-cognition relations.
Izard, C. E. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.561 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations
Rubin, A. M. (1983) · Journal of Broadcasting · doi:10.1080/08838158309386471 · Cited by 912 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consumers may be in a relaxed and passive state (Rubin 1981, 1983) and typically watch television for a longer period of time (Google 2012), often multitasking as they watch (Google 2012).”
BackgroundThe defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust
Darke, P. R., & Ritchie, R. J. B. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.1.114 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics
Marsella, S. C., & Gratch, J. (2009) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.005 · Cited by 452 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It is clear from existing literature that affective complexity is most accurately characterized as a spectrum (Marsella and Gratch 2009; Smith and Kirby 2001).”
BackgroundFeelings, Fantasies, and Memories
Holak, S. L., & Havlena, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(97)00119-7 · Cited by 404 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other researchers point out that nostalgia is often bittersweet, requiring the simultaneous experience of multiple, often conflicting emotions, such as both happiness and sadness (Davis 1979; Holak and Havlena 1998).”
BackgroundClearing the mind: A working memory model of distraction from negative mood.
Van Dillen, L. F., & Koole, S. L. (2007) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.715 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Autonomic specificity of basic emotions: Evidence from pattern classification and cluster analysis
Stephens, C. L., Christie, I. C., & Friedman, B. H. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.014 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Duff, B. R. L., & Faber, R. J. (2011) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367400204 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Redondo, I., & Aznar, G. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.04.008 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Explainable recommendation: when design meets trust calibration
Naiseh, M., Al-Thani, D., Jiang, N., & Ali, R. (2021) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-021-00916-0 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“These techniques have shown an effective way to increase users’ level of understanding and enable consciousness when interacting with the presented information [19, 46].”
Background
- Authors
- Campbell, C., Mattison Thompson, F., Grimm, P. E., & Robson, K.
- Affiliations
- Kent State University (US)
- University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Central Michigan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Campbell, Colin
- Venue
- Journal of Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-06-19
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-423
- ISSN
- 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7805
- OpenAlex
- W2694806686
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advertising (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Kent State University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- ad skipping, advertising avoidance, online video advertising, cognitive resources, ad recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review