Cited by 112Marketing and Advertising StrategiesDigital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Understanding Why Consumers Don't Skip Pre-Roll Video Ads

Campbell, Colin, Mattison Thompson, Frauke, Grimm, Pamela E., Robson, Karen·2017·Journal of Advertising

Abstract

Pre-roll advertising is a novel form of online video advertising that provides consumers with an option to skip after viewing a brief forced segment. Pre-roll ads are unique from other forms of online advertising because pre-roll ads play in exactly the space in which consumers are expecting to view their intended content. Such interruption and obstruction not only heightens consumer irritation but also causes attention-getting tactics, which are redundant in a highly attentive state, to backfire. For these reasons, existing ad avoidance literature may not adequately address this unique format. Employing a large industry data set of pre-roll ads representing multiple countries and product categories, we empirically examine skipping behavior using a broader range of ad characteristics than previous research. We propose that less complex affective ad characteristics increase skipping by failing to engage cognitive resources and therefore leaving cognitive resources available to experience irritation. We further posit that, in a pre-roll context, attention-getting ad characteristics are not only superfluous but actually increase the likelihood consumers recognize pre-roll content as advertising and skip. Our empirical findings support these assertions, identifying new factors driving ad avoidance, and calling into question the applicability of attention-getting advertising approaches in the novel pre-roll environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00913367.2017.1334249

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These techniques have shown an effective way to increase users' level of understanding and enable consciousness when interacting with the presented information.

    “These techniques have shown an effective way to increase users’ level of understanding and enable consciousness when interacting with the presented information [19, 46].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, C., Mattison Thompson, F., Grimm, P. E., & Robson, K.
Affiliations
  • Kent State University (US)
  • University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Central Michigan University (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Colin
Venue
Journal of Advertising
Published
2017-06-19
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
411-423
ISSN
  • 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7805
OpenAlex
W2694806686
Cited by
112
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7
FWCI
14.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advertising (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Kent State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
ad skipping, advertising avoidance, online video advertising, cognitive resources, ad recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review