Cited by 43Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyUrological Disorders and Treatments

Psychological and interpersonal correlates in men with erectile dysfunction and their partners: A pilot study of treatment outcome with sildenafil

Rosen, Raymond, Janssen, Erick, Wiegel, Markus, Bancroft, John, Althof, Stanley, Wincze, John, Segraves, R. Taylor, Barlow, David·2006·Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy

Abstract

The role of psychological and interpersonal factors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) with sildenafil or other oral therapies has not been sufficiently investigated. We conducted a pilot study of psychosocial predictors of pharmacotherapy treatment outcome and satisfaction in men with ED and their partners. Sixty-nine men with mild to moderate ED and their partners were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, treatment trial with sildenafil. Treatment measures included a battery of validated self-report measures and questionnaires. Subjects also were interviewed according to a semistructured interview protocol. Partner assessments included self-report measures of sexual function, mood, and relationship satisfaction. Results indicated that, prior to treatment, patients had erectile function scores in the range of mild to moderate ED, with relatively low levels of concomitant depression, anxiety, and psychological stress and high overall levels of relationship adjustment. Partner sexual function was in the normal range of total Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women (BISF-W; Taylor, Rosen, Leiblum, 1994) scores, although more than one third of female partners had specific sexual complaints or problems. Among couples who completed one or both follow-up visits (N = 34), sildenafil treatment resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of sexual function in men, including sexual desire, orgasmic function, erectile function and overall sexual satisfaction. Significant improvements also were noted in partners' ratings of sexual function in most domains, including arousal, pleasure, and orgasm. Higher baseline levels of sex-specific anxiety were negatively associated with improvement in erections following treatment. Relationship adjustment at baseline, contrary to expectations, did not predict erectile or sexual satisfaction following treatment in the men or their partners but was significantly correlated with changes in sexual desire. Baseline levels of depression, anxiety, and stress generally were unrelated to efficacy or treatment satisfaction. However, we observed a curvilinear relationship in the men between baseline levels of stress and treatment discontinuation (i.e., subjects with moderate levels of stress were less likely to discontinue treatment). Because of a high number of dropouts, results of this pilot study await confirmation in a larger and more adequately powered clinical trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00926230600575314

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 43

Authors
Rosen, R., Janssen, E., Wiegel, M., Bancroft, J., Althof, S., Wincze, J., Segraves, R. T., & Barlow, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Published
2006-06
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
215-234
ISSN
  • 0092-623X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0715
OpenAlex
W2130092390
Cited by
43
References
33
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, sildenafil, psychosocial predictors, treatment outcomes, sexual satisfaction, couples, sexual desire, relationship adjustment, depression, psychological stress, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Sildenafil Citrate, Adult, Anxiety, Coitus, Depression, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Penile Erection, Pilot Projects, Piperazines, Prospective Studies, Purines, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Partners, Stress, Psychological, Sulfones, Vasodilator Agents, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review