Psychological and interpersonal correlates in men with erectile dysfunction and their partners: A pilot study of treatment outcome with sildenafil
Abstract
The role of psychological and interpersonal factors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) with sildenafil or other oral therapies has not been sufficiently investigated. We conducted a pilot study of psychosocial predictors of pharmacotherapy treatment outcome and satisfaction in men with ED and their partners. Sixty-nine men with mild to moderate ED and their partners were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, treatment trial with sildenafil. Treatment measures included a battery of validated self-report measures and questionnaires. Subjects also were interviewed according to a semistructured interview protocol. Partner assessments included self-report measures of sexual function, mood, and relationship satisfaction. Results indicated that, prior to treatment, patients had erectile function scores in the range of mild to moderate ED, with relatively low levels of concomitant depression, anxiety, and psychological stress and high overall levels of relationship adjustment. Partner sexual function was in the normal range of total Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women (BISF-W; Taylor, Rosen, Leiblum, 1994) scores, although more than one third of female partners had specific sexual complaints or problems. Among couples who completed one or both follow-up visits (N = 34), sildenafil treatment resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of sexual function in men, including sexual desire, orgasmic function, erectile function and overall sexual satisfaction. Significant improvements also were noted in partners' ratings of sexual function in most domains, including arousal, pleasure, and orgasm. Higher baseline levels of sex-specific anxiety were negatively associated with improvement in erections following treatment. Relationship adjustment at baseline, contrary to expectations, did not predict erectile or sexual satisfaction following treatment in the men or their partners but was significantly correlated with changes in sexual desire. Baseline levels of depression, anxiety, and stress generally were unrelated to efficacy or treatment satisfaction. However, we observed a curvilinear relationship in the men between baseline levels of stress and treatment discontinuation (i.e., subjects with moderate levels of stress were less likely to discontinue treatment). Because of a high number of dropouts, results of this pilot study await confirmation in a larger and more adequately powered clinical trial.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Use of PDE5 inhibitors may generate false beliefs regarding the possibility to have an erection in all sexual occasions, beyond the partner's seductive capacity.
“In some cases, the use of PDE5 inhibitors may generate false beliefs regarding the possibility to have an erection in all sexual occasions, beyond the partner's seductive capacity.49”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Men tend to ignore or suppress the problem, even when feeling distressed.
“In addition, it is important to include, whenever applicable and possible, the partner during the assessment procedure because (s)he may be aware of the problem first as men tend to ignore or suppress the problem, even when feeling distressed.49,52,53”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
ED and its treatment involve a shared stressor that is challenging for both partners.
“Not only does ED and its treatment involve a shared stressor that is challenging for both partners, but it is also common that sexual changes in 1 partner go along with sexual changes in the other partner.14,51,52”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
The partner often knows more about the circumstances in which the ED occurs and may play an important role in motivating the partner to consider treatment.
“Not only does the partner often know more about the circumstances in which the ED occurs, (s)he may also play an important role in motivating the partner to consider treatment.”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Medical treatments, especially pharmacotherapy, are often viewed as more effective and cost-efficient than psychological treatments.
“Medical treatments, especially pharmacotherapy, are often viewed as more effective and cost-efficient than psychological treatments because the latter raise uncertainty about treatment duration and outcome.49,87,104,105”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Positive involvement of the partner helps solve the problem and adhere to treatment.
“Both partners suffer from the problem, and it has been shown that positive involvement of the partner helps to solve the problem and adhere to treatment.49,52,54,99”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Including the partner in ED treatment promotes treatment adherence, increases treatment success, and targets the partner's own psychological and sexual problems and distress.
“Statement #16: It is recommended to include the partner in ED treatment to promote treatment adherence, increase treatment success, and to target the partner's own psychological and sexual problems and distress (Level 2, Grade B).”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Rosen, R., Janssen, E., Wiegel, M., Bancroft, J., Althof, S., Wincze, J., Segraves, R. T., & Barlow, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 215-234
- ISSN
- 0092-623X (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0715
- OpenAlex
- W2130092390
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- erectile dysfunction, sildenafil, psychosocial predictors, treatment outcomes, sexual satisfaction, couples, sexual desire, relationship adjustment, depression, psychological stress, treatment discontinuation
- MeSH terms
- Sildenafil Citrate, Adult, Anxiety, Coitus, Depression, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Penile Erection, Pilot Projects, Piperazines, Prospective Studies, Purines, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Partners, Stress, Psychological, Sulfones, Vasodilator Agents, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review