The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental Education (EE) for the 21st Century: Where Have We Been? Where Are We Now? Where Are We Headed?
Abstract
When first approached about being a guest editor for this special edition, I had several distinct and separate thoughts. In the final analysis, I felt we should be focused on the present and the fu...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mainstream environmental education approaches have grounded their teaching in the non-human world, with the aim of living in it sustainably.
“Mainstream environmental education approaches have grounded their teaching in the non-human world, with the aim of living in it sustainably”
From An African-centred approach to land education (2014) · cites this paper as Hungerford 2009
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Disinger J. F., 1998, Essential readings in environmental education, 277
- Hug J., 1977, The report of the North American Regional Seminar on Environmental Education for the Real World, 73
- 1978, Connect, UNESCO-UNEP Environmental Education Newsletter, 111, 1
- Wilke, R. J. We need to do more. Paper presented at environmental education conference hosted by the Environmental Institute of Houston. Texas. April.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An African-centred approach to land education
Engel-Di Mauro, S., & Carroll, K. K. (2014) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.865112 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Hungerford, H. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Environmental Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-10-14
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0095-8964
- 1940-1892
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
