Time to Bail out: Examining Gender Differences in the Length of Pretrial Detention Using Survival Analysis
Abstract
Sixty-six percent of the total U.S. jailed population (over 400,000 people) are being held in pretrial detention, not convicted of any crime. Most remain in jail simply because neither they nor their families can afford the bail that a judge has assigned to them. Previous research shows that the assignment of bail is both biased and that being detained in jail negatively impacts later justice outcomes. Women, in general, have been more adversely affected in this area due to their overall fewer social and economic resources compared to men. A sample of 150 women and 150 men was used to compare how gender impacted the length of time it took defendants to bail out of a rural county jail in the southeastern U.S. Using previous literature, pathways theory, and the theoretical lens of an architecture of gendered violence, the authors tested for gendered differences in how quickly women and men posted bail once in pretrial detention. A combination of a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional multiple-regression analysis indicated that women took significantly longer than men to post bail, while controlling for bail amount, age, and race. Implications for policy and research are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Female defendants were 29% less likely to post bail than men.
“However, Kenney & Dolliver (2022) found female defendants took longer to post the same cash bail amount as their male counterparts and were 29% less likely to post bail than men.”
From A Scoping Review of the Relationships Between Cash Bail, Failure to Appear, Re-Arrest, Health and Well-Being, Race, and Gender (2026) · cites this paper as Kenney & Dolliver (2022)
Female defendants took longer to post the same cash bail amount as their male counterparts.
“However, Kenney & Dolliver (2022) found female defendants took longer to post the same cash bail amount as their male counterparts and were 29% less likely to post bail than men.”
From A Scoping Review of the Relationships Between Cash Bail, Failure to Appear, Re-Arrest, Health and Well-Being, Race, and Gender (2026) · cites this paper as Kenney & Dolliver (2022)
Cites
Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., & Yang, C. S. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20161503 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scheadler, T. R., Radney, A., Smith, B. L., Munshi, A., & Cole, E. (2026) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-025-09860-5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“However, Kenney & Dolliver (2022) found female defendants took longer to post the same cash bail amount as their male counterparts and were 29% less likely to post bail than men.”
- Authors
- Kenney, J. L., & Dolliver, M. J.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Sacramento (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dolliver, Matthew J.
- Venue
- Justice System Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-02-24
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-217
- ISSN
- 0098-261X (ISSN-L)
- 2327-7556
- OpenAlex
- W4213415558
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Justice System Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Keywords
- pretrial detention, bail, gender differences, women in the criminal justice system, social and economic resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review