Cited by 27Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

VULCAN-SUPPORTED Pt ELECTROCATALYSTS FOR PEMFCs PREPARED USING SUPERCRITICAL CARBON DIOXIDE DEPOSITION

Open access
Bayrakçeken, Ayşe, Smirnova, Alevtina, Kitkamthorn, Usanee, Aindow, Mark, Türker, Lemi, Eroğlu, İnc[idot, Erkey, Can·2008·Chemical Engineering Communications

Abstract

In this study, supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) deposition was used to prepare vulcan-supported Pt (Pt/Vulcan) electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), and the effects of process variables on the properties of the electrocatalysts were investigated. The two different methods used to reduce the organometallic precursor were thermal reduction in nitrogen at atmospheric pressure and thermal reduction in scCO2. In the former method, the maximum Pt loading achieved was 9%, and this was governed by the adsorption isotherm of the Pt precursor between the scCO2 phase and the Vulcan phase. By using the latter method, higher Pt loadings of 15% and 35% could be achieved. The Pt/Vulcan catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and cyclic voltammetry (CV). The average particle sizes for Pt/Vulcan 9%, 15%, and 35% catalysts were 1.2, 1.3, and 2 nm, respectively. Electrochemical surface areas obtained from CV data were found to vary with the Pt loading.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00986440802290110

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SCD in combination with aerogels eliminates the risk of meso- and micropore deformation or collapse during impregnation of the Pt precursor and during depressurization, due to the absence of capillary forces in the supercritical state.

    “SCD can be considered a particularly attractive technique in combination with aerogels, since the risk of meso- and micropore deformation or collapse during the impregnation of Pt precursor and during the depressurization is eliminated due to the absence of capillary forces in the supercritical state.[55–59]”

    From Synthesis of Pt Carbon Aerogel Electrocatalysts with Multiscale Porosity Derived from Cellulose and Chitosan Biopolymer Aerogels via Supercritical Deposition for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Introduction and Conclusion describe impregnating Vulcan carbon black with a Pt precursor in supercritical CO₂, not using aerogels. Searches for capillary forces, pore collapse, and deformation found no passage stating that this process eliminates those risks during impregnation or depressurization; the References list aerogel studies but do not establish the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hoogers, G., ed. (2003). Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
  2. Zhang, Y. and Erkey, C. (2006). Preparation of supported metallic nanoparticles using super- critical fluids: A review, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 38, 252-267.
  3. Zhang, J., Wang, X., Wu, C., Wang, H., Yi, B., and Zhang, H. (2004). Preparation and char- acterization of Pt=C catalysts for PEMFC cathode: Effect of different reduction methods, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 83(2), 229-236.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayrakçeken, A., Smirnova, A., Kitkamthorn, U., Aindow, M., Türker, L., Eroğlu, İ., & Erkey, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Suranaree University of Technology (TH)
  • Middle East Technical University (TR)
  • Koç University (TR)
Corresponding author
Erkey, Can
Venue
Chemical Engineering Communications
Published
2008-10-08
Volume
196
Issue
1-2
Pages
194-203
ISSN
  • 0098-6445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1563-5201
OpenAlex
W2125889592
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Engineering Communications (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
platinum electrocatalysts, Vulcan carbon support, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, platinum loading, platinum particle size, electrochemically active surface area, hydrogen oxidation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review