The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Macro- and micro-wear traces on lithic projectile points. Experimental results and prehistoric examples
Abstract
(1984). Macro and Micro Wear Traces on Lithic Projectile Points. Journal of Danish Archaeology: Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 19-46.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Linear polishes and striations are microscopic damage indicating projectile impact.
“Experimental studies also determined microscopic damage indicating projectile impact.These are linear polishes and striations (Fischer et al., 1984;Moss and Newcomer, 1982;Crombe et al., 2001).”
From Design and performance of microlith implemented projectiles during the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: experimental and archaeological evidence (2010) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 1984
Frequencies of macro-damage on projectile tips vary from 32% to 41%.
“while the frequencies of macro-damage on projectile tips vary from 32% (Crombe et al., 2001) to 41% (Fischer et al., 1984).”
From Design and performance of microlith implemented projectiles during the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: experimental and archaeological evidence (2010) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 1984
For microlithic inserts, a spin-off of 1 mm length is considered diagnostic of projectile impact.
“For microlithic inserts a spin-off of 1mm length is considered as diagnostic of projectile impact, as shown by experimental results (Fischer et al., 1984).”
From Design and performance of microlith implemented projectiles during the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: experimental and archaeological evidence (2010) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 1984
Two types of fractures can be recognized as diagnostic of projectile impact: step terminating bending fracture and spin-off.
“Fisher et al., (1984) determined that two types of fractures can be recognized as diagnostic of projectile impact, i.e., fracture types that could not have been produced as a result of other activities or as a result of production accident or trampling.”
From Design and performance of microlith implemented projectiles during the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: experimental and archaeological evidence (2010) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 1984
The most common projectile damage described in experiments are bending and spin-off fractures that initiate either on a dorsal or ventral surface and continue parallel to the longitudinal axis of the point, removing part of its surface or part of its lateral edge.
“The most common projectile damage described in the experiments are bending and spin-off fractures that initiate either on a dorsal or ventral surface and continue parallel to the longitudinal axis of the point removing part of its surface or part of its lateral edge.”
From Design and performance of microlith implemented projectiles during the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: experimental and archaeological evidence (2010) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 1984
Experiments with both weapon types have shown that spear and arrowheads receive similar types of fractures diagnostic of projectile impact.
“While no direct evidence of preserved weapons from the Late Pleistocene in the region were found (Valla, 1987), experiments with both weapon types have shown that spear and arrowheads receive similar types of fractures diagnostic of projectile impact (Fischer et al., 1984;Odell and Cowan, 1986;Cattelain, 1997).”
From Design and performance of microlith implemented projectiles during the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: experimental and archaeological evidence (2010) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 1984
The use of flint points as tips of spears resulted in more prominent fractures in terms of their size and frequency than their use as arrowheads.
“It has been indicated, however, that the use of flint points as tips of spears resulted in more prominent fractures in terms of their size and frequency than their use as arrowheads (Fischer et al., 1984).”
From Design and performance of microlith implemented projectiles during the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: experimental and archaeological evidence (2010) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 1984
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- Andersen S. H., 1975, Kuml, 1973
- Andersen S. H., 1980, Antikvariske Studier, 4
- Andersen S. H., 1981, Danmarkshistorien, Stenalderen 1, Jœgerstenalderen.
- Barton R. N.E., 1982, World Archaeology, 14
- Becker C. J., 1945, Fra Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark
- Becker C. J., 1971, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society
- Bergman C. A., 1983, Journal of Field Archaeology, 10
- Cotterell B., 1979, Lithic Use-Wear Analysis.
- Crabtree D. E., 1966, Tebiwa, Journal of the Idaho State University Museum, 9
- Degerbøl M., 1970, The Urus and Neolithic Domesticated Cattle in Denmark.
- Fischer A., 1978, Hikuin, 4
- Fischer A., 1984, Uroksen fra Prejlerup. Et arkœo-zoologisk fund.
- Hansen P. V., 1983, Journal of Danish Archaeology, 2
- Hartz N., 1906, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie.
- Hester T. R., 1973, American Antiquity, 38
- Holm J., 1973, Ærø. Fynske Minder
- Hayden B., 1979, Lithic Use-Wear Analysis.
- Iversen J., 1947, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie
- Jørgensen S., 1956, Kuml
- Jørgensen S., 1961, Ber. über den V. Intern. Kongress für Vor- und Frühgeschichte, Hamburg 1958.
- Keeley L. H., 1980, Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses.
- Keeley L. H., 1977, Case. Journal of Archaeological Science, 4
- Larsson L., 1982, Skateholmsprojectet—En utställningskatalog om et fångstsamhälle för 7000 år sedan., 13
- Lawrence R. A., 1979, Lithic Use-Wear Analysis.
- Malmer M. P., 1969, Meddelanden från Lunds Universitets Historiska Museum, 1966
- Malmros C., 1975, Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark
- Madsen A. P., 1868, Afbildninger fra Stenalderen.
- Mathiassen T., 1947, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie
- Mathiassen T., 1948, Danske Oldsager, Bd. I, Ældre Stenalder.
- Moss E. H., 1982, Tailler! Pour quoi faire: Prehistoire et technologie lithique II. Recent progres in microwear studies.
- Møhl U., 1979, Kuml
- Møhl U., 1980, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie
- Möller C., 1975, Hammaburg
- Noe-nygaard N., 1971, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 21
- Noe-nygaard N., 1973, Meddelelser fra Danmarks geologiske Forming, 22
- Noe-nygaard N., 1974, Journal of Archaeological Science, 1
- Noe-nygaard N., 1981, Archaeozoological Studies
- Odell G. H., 1978, Bulletin de la Societe Prehistorique Francaise
- Paulsen H., 1975, Die Heimat
- Petersen P. V., 1979, Søllerødbogen
- Rust A., 1943, Die Alt- und mittelsteinzeitlichen Funde von Stellmoor.
- Schütrumpf R., 1943, Die Alt- und Mittelsteinzeitlischen Funde von Stellmoor.
- Tauber H., 1971, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie
- Troels-smith J., 1954, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie
- Troels-smith J., 1960, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie
- Troels-smith J., 1960, The Smithsonian Report for 1959.
- Troels-smith J., 1967, Palaeohistoria, 12
- Troels-smith J., 1981, Archaologie der Schweiz
- Tsirk A., 1979, Lithic Use-Wear Analysis.
- Usinger H., 1975, Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Geobotanik in Schleswig-Holstein und Hamburg
- Aaris-sørensen K., 1984, Alle tiders Odsherred
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yaroshevich, A., Kaufman, D., Nuzhnyy, D., Bar-Yosef, O., & Weinstein-Evron, M. (2010) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.050 · Cited by 164
The Howiesons Poort and MSA III at Klasies River main site, Cave 1A
Villa, P., Soriano, S., Teyssandier, N., & Wurz, S. (2010) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.028 · Cited by 163
Smudge Pits and Stone “Drills”: The Use of Chipped Stone Tools at Burrell Orchard
Miller, G. L., & Redmond, B. G. (2016) · Lithic Technology · doi:10.1080/01977261.2016.1168145 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- FISCHER, A., HANSEN, P. V., & RASMUSSEN, P.
- Affiliations
- a The National Agency for the Protection of Nature, Monuments and Sites , Fredningsstyrelsen, Amaliegade 13, DK-1256 , Copenhagen K
- b Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology, University of Copenhagen , Vandkunsten 5, DK-1467 , Copenhagen K
- c The National Museum, Dept. of Natural Science , Ny Vestergade 11, DK-1471 , Copenhagen K
- Venue
- Journal of Danish Archaeology
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-46
- ISSN
- 0108-464X
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review