CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 215Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationMigration and Labor DynamicsDiaspora, migration, transnational identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social effects of mass deportations by the United States government, 2000–10

Hagan, Jacqueline Maria, Rodriguez, Nestor, Castro, Brianna·2011·Ethnic and Racial Studies
DOI 10.1080/01419870.2011.575233
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Interviews with deportees in El Salvador and Mexico and with immigrants in the United States indicate that expanded US enforcement policies are straining transnational families and imposing fear on immigrant communities. Expanded enforcement is removing long-term settlers with strong kinship ties to the United States. Through various strategies, some immigrants attempt to cope with new enforcement operations, while others involuntarily return to their home communities. The findings suggest that (1) conceptualizations of immigration policy enactment of the ‘liberal state’ need to be reassessed, and (2) migration policies of the United States, Mexico and El Salvador need to be revisited in light of their human costs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01419870.2011.575233

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Aleinkoff T. A., 2001, Immigration and Nationality Laws of the United States: Statutes, Regulations, and Forms
  2. Bada Xochitl, 2010, Context Matters: Latino Immigrant Civic Engagement in Nine U.S. Cities
  3. Capps Randy, 2011, Delegation and Divergence: A Study of 287(g) State and Local Immigration Enforcement
  4. Lytle Hernandez Kelley, 2006, Western Historical Society, 3, 421
  5. Mendoza Marcela, 2009, Oregon Review of International Law, 11, 111
  6. Nguyen Mai, 2010, The Costs and Consequences of Local Immigration Enforcement in North Carolina
  7. Passel Jeffrey, 2010, U.S. Unauthorized Flows are Down Sharply since Mid-Decade
  8. Weissman D., 2009, The Policies and Politics of Local Immigration Enforcement Laws

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hagan, J. M., Rodriguez, N., & Castro, B.
Corresponding author
Hagan, Jacqueline Maria
ORCID
Castro, Brianna
Venue
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2011-08
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1374-1391
ISSN
  • 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4356
DOI
10.1080/01419870.2011.575233
OpenAlex
W2164413312
Cited by
215
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
44.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethnic and Racial Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
Keywords
mass deportation, immigration enforcement, transnational families, deportees, immigrant communities, kinship ties, return migration, liberal state, United States immigration policy, El Salvador, Mexico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review