Cited by 19War, Law, and JusticeDiaspora, migration, transnational identityPeacebuilding and International Security

Networking justice: digitally-enabled engagement in transitional justice by the Syrian diaspora

Tenove, Chris·2019·Ethnic and Racial Studies

Abstract

Digital communication technologies (DCTs) introduce new opportunities and challenges for diaspora to advance transitional justice. This article proposes three DCT-enabled mechanisms that shape diaspora engagement with transitional justice politics and processes, developed through an analysis of diaspora responses to rights violations in Syria. First, diaspora can promote transitional justice aims through connective action: loosely-coordinated, transnational mobilizations using social media. Second, DCTs enable diaspora to contribute to crowdsourced documentation of rights violations. Third, diaspora seeking to advance transitional justice may face digital repression by authoritarian governments in their original homelands. The article shows how DCTs may alter the means and opportunities for diaspora to engage in transitional justice activities, including in situations of ongoing conflict or repression in their original homelands. It also demonstrates how digital spaces are strategically engaged by activists, civil society organizations, state governments, and other actors seeking to advance or contest transitional justice aims.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01419870.2019.1569702

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many but not all scholars only include the use of digital tools for repression as digital repression; this is incomplete and misses other aspects of what is new about some forms of digital repression.

    “Although many, but not all (12), scholars only include the use of digital tools for repression as digital repression (13), we argue below that this is incomplete and misses other aspects of what is “new” about some forms of digital repression.”

    From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tenove, C.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Tenove, Chris
Venue
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Published
2019-02-11
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
1950-1969
ISSN
  • 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4356
OpenAlex
W2913735993
Cited by
19
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethnic and Racial Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (756-2014-0679)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
Keywords
transitional justice, Syrian diaspora, digital communication tools, social media mobilization, digital repression, authoritarian repression, rights violations, transnational activism, civil society organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review