The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research
Open accessAbstract
The tutor role in problem-based learning (PBL) has attracted the interest of many researchers and has led to an abundance of studies. This article reports on major trends in studies investigating the tutor during the past 10 years. Three major trends were observed by the authors while analysing the studies conducted: studies on the differential influence of content expert and non-content expert tutors on student achievement, studies on process variables, and studies on the relationship between tutor characteristics and differential contextual circumstances. The aim of this article is to summarize the main findings of the studies conducted so far within the three trends observed, to provide directions for educational practitioners and policy makers, and to suggest directions for future research questions. The studies included were selected by conducting a literature search in medical journals, which was complemented with the personal archives of the authors. The results of the studies conducted within the three trends of research have led to advanced insights in tutoring. The outcomes revealed that content expert tutors tend to use their subject-matter expertise more to direct the discussion in the tutorial group, whereas non-content expert tutors tend to use their process-facilitation expertise more to direct the tutorial group. Furthermore, a tutor's performance is not a stable characteristic but is partly situation specific. It is concluded that a tutor should both know how to deal with the subject matter expertise and should know how to facilitate the learning process. Faculty and policy makers should put substantial efforts into designing curricula and cases and developing tutors' skills by faculty development strategies that stimulate reflection. The research agenda should be driven more by modern educational theories of learning in which tutoring is a process aimed at stimulating constructive, self-directed, situated and collaborative learning by students. Furthermore, more qualitative studies should be conducted to gain better insights in teachers' conceptions about the tutor role and student learning to better understand their behaviours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-Assessment in the Health Professions: A Reformulation and Research Agenda
Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2005) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200510001-00015 · Cited by 992
Self‐directed learning in nurse education: a review of the literature
O'Shea, E. (2003) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02673.x · Cited by 342
Online moderation of synchronous e-argumentation
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2010) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9088-2 · Cited by 82
Garcia, I., James, R. W., Bischof, P., & Baroffio, A. (2017) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2017.1279056 · Cited by 60
Instructional Scaffolding: Foundations and Evolving Definition
Belland, B. R. (2017) · Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0_2 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Gijselaers, W. H., Moust, J. H. C., Grave, W. S. D., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Vleuten, C. P. M. V. D.
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-180
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W2141549094
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01421590220125277
- The paper
- Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Gijselaers, W. H., Moust, J. H. C., Grave, W. S. D., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Vleuten, C. P. M. V. D. (2002). Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research. Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590220125277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.