Cited by 82Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended LearningIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Online moderation of synchronous e-argumentation

Asterhan, Christa S. C., Schwarz, Baruch B.·2010·International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11412-010-9088-2

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants reported that they found the nature of synchronous and asynchronous communications to be different from one another.

    “participants reported that they found the nature of synchronous and asynchronous communications to be different from one another similar to what Asterhan and Schwarz (2010) found.”

    From Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning (2014) · cites this paper as Asterhan and Schwarz (2010)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 98 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Asterhan, Christa S. C.
Venue
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Published
2010-06-19
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
259-282
ISSN
  • 1556-1607 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-1615
OpenAlex
W2088743325
Cited by
82
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
online content moderation, blended learning, small group discussion, design research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review