The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Realist approach to evaluating an interprofessional education program for medical students in clinical practice at a community hospital
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: We examined the interrelationships between context, mechanism, and outcome using a realist approach following the introduction of interprofessional education (IPE) to clinical practice for medical students in the community.Methods: Through participant observation and interviews, a working hypothesis was developed. To evaluate IPE in clinical practice, medical students’ reports were thematically analyzed, and configuration on contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes were identified using a realist approach.Results: Influential contexts were medical students’ experience of clinical practice and learning characteristics, the capacity of other professionals, interprofessional relationships, and characteristics of the community hospital. One key mechanism was observational learning. Others were self-regulated learning, legitimate peripheral participation, experiential learning, contact hypotheses, awareness of social structure, and cognitive empathy. As faculties supported these key mechanisms, medical students became aware of the legitimacy of community-oriented primary care, noting the roles of physicians who support patients’ and/or their family’s life in collaboration with other professionals, and reflecting the necessity of shifting from physician-centered perspectives. As a result, medical students deepened their empathic understanding for other professionals.Conclusion: Faculties should develop IPE programs in clinical practice based on the ‘mechanism’, ‘context’, ‘outcome’ pattern and ‘context-mechanism-outcome’ configuration in primary care settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices
Prasad, V., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-1 · Cited by 723
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1287/orsc.1070.0293 · DOI
- 10.1177/1098214010371972 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3928/01484834-20131118-04 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12909-016-0848-1 · DOI
- Boud D, 1985, Reflection: turning experience into learning, 18
- 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000490 · DOI
- 10.1080/10872981.2018.1537431 · DOI
- 10.1177/1356389005053198 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001108 · DOI
- Dalkin SM, 2015, Implement Sci, 10, 1
- 10.1007/s10912-006-9021-x · DOI
- Fatemeh A, 2015, J Educ Health Promot, 4, 2, 10.4103/2277-9531.151867 · DOI
- Funnell S, Rogers PJ. 2011. Purposeful program theory. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
- Gilbert JV, 2010, J Allied Health, 39, 196
- 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000232 · DOI
- 10.1080/13561820.2018.1433642 · DOI
- 10.3109/13561820.2011.644355 · DOI
- 10.1080/14739879.2017.1409084 · DOI
- 10.3109/0142159X.2013.765550 · DOI
- Institute of Medicine., 2015, Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes
- 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00579 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4103/1357-6283.134311 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0210912 · DOI
- 10.1891/9780826195524 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12909-016-0766-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1406074 · DOI
- Merton RK, 1968, Social theory and social structure
- 10.3109/13561820.2012.673512 · DOI
- Ogawa S, 2015, J Res Interprof Pract Educ, 5, 1
- 10.3928/01484834-20091113-08 · DOI
- Freire P, 2013, Education for critical consciousness
- 10.1177/1356389012440912 · DOI
- Pawson R, Tilley N. 2004. Realist Evaluation. London (UK): Sage Publications Ltd.
- Pawson R, Tilley N. 1997. Realistic evaluation. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
- Reeves S, 2013, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, CD002213
- 10.1590/1807-57622014.0092 · DOI
- 10.1080/10401334.2018.1489817 · DOI
- Salter KL, 2014, Implement Sci, 9, 1
- 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002345 · DOI
- 10.1177/2373379914561470 · DOI
- Tosey P. 2006. Bateson’s levels of learning: a framework for transformative learning? In: University of Tilburg, editor. Forum for Human Resource Development Conference. p. 1–15. https://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/1198/1/fulltext.pdf.
- 10.1080/13561820.2017.1315060 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Haruta, J., & Yamamoto, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Tsukuba (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Haruta, Junji
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-10-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-110
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W2979891124
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Medical Teacher (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K19377)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- interprofessional education, medical students, clinical practice, community hospitals, primary care, context-mechanism-outcome, observational learning, student self-regulation, legitimate peripheral participation, experiential learning, contact hypothesis, cognitive empathy, interprofessional relations, faculty support
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Hospitals, Community, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Patient Care Team, Students, Medical, Program Evaluation, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review