Cited by 850Evaluation and Performance AssessmentQualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Unpacking black boxes: mechanisms and theory building in evaluation

Astbury, Brad, Leeuw, Frans L.·2010·American Journal of Evaluation

Abstract

There is growing interest in the concept of ‘‘mechanism’’ across many areas of the social sciences. In the field of program and policy evaluation, a number of scholars have also emphasized the importance of causal mechanisms for explaining how and why programs work. However, there appears to be some ambiguity about the meaning and uses of mechanism-based thinking in both the social science and evaluation literature. In this article we attempt to clarify what is meant by mechanisms in the context of program evaluation by identifying three main characteristics of mechanisms and outlining a possible typology of mechanisms. A number of theoretical and practical implications for evaluators are also discussed, along with some precautions to consider when investigating mechanisms that might plausibly account for program outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1098214010371972

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both a published literature review and critical discussions in the applied literature cite several methodological challenges associated with a RE approach, including deciding what constitutes a mechanism, and differentiating between what is a mechanism and what is context.

    “Both a published literature review 112 and critical discussions in the applied literature cite several methodological challenges associated with a RE approach, including deciding what constitutes a mechanism, 127 and indeed differentiating between what is a mechanism and what is context.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Astbury, B., & Leeuw, F. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Astbury, Brad
Venue
American Journal of Evaluation
Published
2010-09
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
363-381
ISSN
  • 1098-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0878
OpenAlex
W2028200801
Cited by
850
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
26.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
causal mechanisms, program evaluation, policy evaluation, theory development, program outcomes, evaluator practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review