Cited by 18Educational Research and MethodsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Essential concepts for effective mixed methods research in the health professions: AMEE Guide No. 173

Abstract

Mixed-methods research involves combining quantitative and qualitative approaches and mixing and integrating at multiple stages. It is gaining more attention and interest in health professions education research and evaluation. However, many undertake mixed-methods research for the first time without a rich understanding of the differences in practice associated with mixed-methods research. This often leads to research efforts that do not result in more complex, nuanced understandings of the phenomena being studied. Mixed-methods research requires researchers to thoughtfully and often creatively weave together their projects' various qualitative and quantitative strands. This effort ideally starts at the design stage and continues through the remainder of the research effort. We have aggregated resources and organized this guide to introduce researchers to what we see as some essential concepts, practices, and scholarship in mixed methods which will be useful to those just starting on their mixed-methods journey and those already engaging in mixed-methods research. This guide begins by discussing three vital characteristics of mixed-methods research that set it apart from mono-method research: its purposes, alternative philosophical stances, and integration, long viewed as a defining characteristic. We then discuss further important considerations, such as conducting mixed-methods literature reviews, timing and priority of qualitative and quantitative strands, and research design typologies. To complement these discussions, we have provided illustrative examples of high-quality peer-reviewed mixed-methods research from health professions education and other closely associated areas (e.g. health and clinical research). This guide also includes several activities and recommended resources, such as journals, textbooks, and professional societies, that researchers can use to deepen their practice and understanding and mixed-methods research. We hope the content, resources, article examples, and activities will be the prologue to fruitful explorations of mixed-methods research, helping researchers make informed, intentional choices about future mixed-methods efforts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0142159x.2024.2401464

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.3102/0013189X018007004 · DOI
  2. Creamer EG. An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods. 2017. SAGE Publications, Inc; 1st edition (March 15, 2017) Thousand Oaks, CA
  3. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Third edition: designing and conducting mixed methods research approach. 2017. SAGE Publications, Inc; 3rd edition (October 6, 2017) Thousand Oaks, CA
  4. Greene JC. Mixed methods in social inquiry. (1st edition). Jossey-Bass; 2007. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Mixed+Methods+in+Social+Inquiry-p-9780787983826
  5. 10.4135/9781506335193 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1177/1558689815571132 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/1558689806298224 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/S11135-018-0700-2/METRICS · DOI
  9. 10.17730/humo.37.4.181457u6563w1187 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1558689812437183 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1612520 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000332 · DOI
  13. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.) Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5 pp. 307-337). Greenwich CT: Information Age Publishing. 2006.
  14. 10.1177/1468794106058870 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/GERONT/27.4.516 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/1558689819844038 · DOI
  17. Guba EG Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oaks CA.
  18. Maxwell JA. Paradigms or toolkits? Philosophical and methodological positions as heuristics for mixed methods research. Mid-West Educ Res. 2011;24(2):27–30.
  19. 10.1177/1558689815575861 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x · DOI
  21. 10.4135/9781506335193.n5 · DOI
  22. 10.4135/9781506335193.n6 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/109821409902000102 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/2345678906292462 · DOI
  25. Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2012.
  26. Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2021.
  27. 10.1177/1558689820956401 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/0002764211426330 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/15586898211001974 · DOI
  30. Onwuegbuzie A, Collins K. The role of sampling in mixed methods-research. Köln Z Soziol. 2017;69. · DOI
  31. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research : integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2009.
  32. 10.1016/j.metip.2021.100080 · DOI
  33. 10.1370/afm.1865 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1136/bmj.c4587 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Fetters MD. The mixed methods research workbook: activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Vol. 7. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2019.
  36. Leeman J, Voils CI, Sandelowski M. Conducting mixed methods literature reviews: Synthesizing the evidence needed to develop and implement complex social and health interventions. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 167–184). Oxford University Press; 2015.
  37. 10.1177/1558689812461179 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Maxwell J, LoomisD. Mixed methods design: an alternative approach. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddle (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. (pp. 241-272). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage; 2003.

Metadata

Authors
Battista, A., Torre, D., & Konopasky, A.
Affiliations
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Battista, Alexis
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2024-09-23
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
766-778
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W4402746461
Cited by
18
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 1
FWCI
22.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
mixed methods, health professions education research, qualitative-quantitative integration, research philosophy, research design
MeSH terms
Health Occupations, Humans, Research Design, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review