The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Essential concepts for effective mixed methods research in the health professions: AMEE Guide No. 173
Abstract
Mixed-methods research involves combining quantitative and qualitative approaches and mixing and integrating at multiple stages. It is gaining more attention and interest in health professions education research and evaluation. However, many undertake mixed-methods research for the first time without a rich understanding of the differences in practice associated with mixed-methods research. This often leads to research efforts that do not result in more complex, nuanced understandings of the phenomena being studied. Mixed-methods research requires researchers to thoughtfully and often creatively weave together their projects' various qualitative and quantitative strands. This effort ideally starts at the design stage and continues through the remainder of the research effort. We have aggregated resources and organized this guide to introduce researchers to what we see as some essential concepts, practices, and scholarship in mixed methods which will be useful to those just starting on their mixed-methods journey and those already engaging in mixed-methods research. This guide begins by discussing three vital characteristics of mixed-methods research that set it apart from mono-method research: its purposes, alternative philosophical stances, and integration, long viewed as a defining characteristic. We then discuss further important considerations, such as conducting mixed-methods literature reviews, timing and priority of qualitative and quantitative strands, and research design typologies. To complement these discussions, we have provided illustrative examples of high-quality peer-reviewed mixed-methods research from health professions education and other closely associated areas (e.g. health and clinical research). This guide also includes several activities and recommended resources, such as journals, textbooks, and professional societies, that researchers can use to deepen their practice and understanding and mixed-methods research. We hope the content, resources, article examples, and activities will be the prologue to fruitful explorations of mixed-methods research, helping researchers make informed, intentional choices about future mixed-methods efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117 · Cited by 7,219 · cited 1×
“One way for novices to approach integration is to break it down into smaller components of ‘mixing’ during different phases of a research project, such as at the design phase and the methods phase [2,29].”
Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done
Bryman, A. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106058877 · Cited by 3,354
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.3102/0013189X018007004 · DOI
- Creamer EG. An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods. 2017. SAGE Publications, Inc; 1st edition (March 15, 2017) Thousand Oaks, CA
- Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Third edition: designing and conducting mixed methods research approach. 2017. SAGE Publications, Inc; 3rd edition (October 6, 2017) Thousand Oaks, CA
- Greene JC. Mixed methods in social inquiry. (1st edition). Jossey-Bass; 2007. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Mixed+Methods+in+Social+Inquiry-p-9780787983826
- 10.4135/9781506335193 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1558689815571132 · DOI
- 10.1177/1558689806298224 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/S11135-018-0700-2/METRICS · DOI
- 10.17730/humo.37.4.181457u6563w1187 · DOI
- 10.1177/1558689812437183 · DOI
- 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1612520 · DOI
- 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000332 · DOI
- Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.) Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5 pp. 307-337). Greenwich CT: Information Age Publishing. 2006.
- 10.1177/1468794106058870 · DOI
- 10.1093/GERONT/27.4.516 · DOI
- 10.1177/1558689819844038 · DOI
- Guba EG Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oaks CA.
- Maxwell JA. Paradigms or toolkits? Philosophical and methodological positions as heuristics for mixed methods research. Mid-West Educ Res. 2011;24(2):27–30.
- 10.1177/1558689815575861 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x · DOI
- 10.4135/9781506335193.n5 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781506335193.n6 · DOI
- 10.1177/109821409902000102 · DOI
- 10.1177/2345678906292462 · DOI
- Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2012.
- Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2021.
- 10.1177/1558689820956401 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002764211426330 · DOI
- 10.1177/15586898211001974 · DOI
- Onwuegbuzie A, Collins K. The role of sampling in mixed methods-research. Köln Z Soziol. 2017;69. · DOI
- Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research : integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2009.
- 10.1016/j.metip.2021.100080 · DOI
- 10.1370/afm.1865 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.c4587 · DOI · Paper page
- Fetters MD. The mixed methods research workbook: activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Vol. 7. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2019.
- Leeman J, Voils CI, Sandelowski M. Conducting mixed methods literature reviews: Synthesizing the evidence needed to develop and implement complex social and health interventions. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 167–184). Oxford University Press; 2015.
- 10.1177/1558689812461179 · DOI · Paper page
- Maxwell J, LoomisD. Mixed methods design: an alternative approach. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddle (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. (pp. 241-272). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage; 2003.
Metadata
- Authors
- Battista, A., Torre, D., & Konopasky, A.
- Affiliations
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Battista, Alexis
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-09-23
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 766-778
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W4402746461
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 22.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
- Keywords
- mixed methods, health professions education research, qualitative-quantitative integration, research philosophy, research design
- MeSH terms
- Health Occupations, Humans, Research Design, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review