The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Higher education, social class and the mobilisation of capitals: recognising and playing the game
Open accessAbstract
Strategies employed by middle-class families to ensure successful educational outcomes for their children have long been the focus of theoretical and empirical analysis in the United Kingdom and beyond. In austerity England, the issue of middle-class social reproduction through higher education increases in saliency, and students’ awareness of how to ‘play the game’ of enhancing their chances to acquire a sought-after graduate position becomes increasingly important. Using data from a longitudinal study of working-class and middle-class undergraduates at Bristol’s two universities (the Paired Peers project), we employ Bourdieu’s conceptual tools to examine processes of capital mobilisation and acquisition by students to enhance future social positioning. We highlight middle-class advantage over privileged access to valued capitals, and argue that the emphasis on competition, both in terms of educational outcomes and the accrual of capital in the lives of working-class and middle-class students, compounds rather than alleviates social inequalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste*
Bourdieu, P. (2018) · Food and Culture · doi:10.4324/9781315680347-10 · Cited by 20,289
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.
Warner, M., Bourdieu, P., & Nice, R. (1985) · MLN · doi:10.2307/2905454 · Cited by 14,091
Bourdieu, P. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch15 · Cited by 13,906
The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society
Bourdıeu, P., & Ferguson, P. P. (1999) · Cited by 2,424
Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life
Lareau, A. (2011) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520949904 · Cited by 2,188
The Moral Significance of Class
Sayer, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488863 · Cited by 1,105
British Educational Research Journal
(2013) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/(issn)1469-3518 · Cited by 971
‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working‐class students in UK higher education
Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2010) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920902878925 · Cited by 813
Tomlinson, M. (2008) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425690701737457 · Cited by 739
Cited by
Forms of graduate capital and their relationship to graduate employability
Tomlinson, M. (2017) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-05-2016-0090 · Cited by 678
Addison, M. (2017) · Emotion, Space and Society · doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2017.01.003 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Bathmaker, A.-M., Ingram, N., & Waller, R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sociology of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-09-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 723-743
- ISSN
- 0142-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3346
- OpenAlex
- W2163353489
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 56.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Higher education, social class and the mobilisation of capitals: recognising and playing the game. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01425692.2013.816041
- The paper
- Bathmaker, A.-M., Ingram, N., & Waller, R. (2013). Higher education, social class and the mobilisation of capitals: recognising and playing the game. British Journal of Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.816041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.