The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working‐class students in UK higher education
Open accessAbstract
Drawing on case studies of 27 working‐class students across four UK higher education institutions, this article attempts to develop a multilayered, sociological understanding of student identities that draws together social and academic aspects. Working with a concept of student identity that combines the more specific notion of learner identity with more general understandings of how students are positioned in relation to their discipline, their peer group and the wider university, the article examines the influence of widely differing academic places and spaces on student identities. Differences between institutions are conceptualised in terms of institutional habitus, and the article explores how the four different institutional habituses result in a range of experiences of fitting in and standing out in higher education. For some this involves combining a sense of belonging in both middle‐class higher education and working‐class homes, while others only partially absorb a sense of themselves as students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes
Walpole, M. (2003) · The Review of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/rhe.2003.0044 · Cited by 751
Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement, and College Culture
Holland, D. C., Eisenhart, M. A., & Connell, R. W. (1990) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226218496.001.0001 · Cited by 444
Aries, E., & Seider, M. (2007) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.147.2.137-157 · Cited by 112
Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity
McDonough, P. M. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9781438412412 · Cited by 37
Cited by
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12251 · Cited by 831
“For example, Reay, Crozier, and Clayton (2010) interviewed students from working-class backgroundswhowere attending one of four HE institutions, including an elite university (named Southern in the report).”
BackgroundHigher education, social class and the mobilisation of capitals: recognising and playing the game
Bathmaker, A.-M., Ingram, N., & Waller, R. (2013) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.816041 · Cited by 458
Control by numbers: new managerialism and ranking in higher education
Lynch, K. (2015) · Critical Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/17508487.2014.949811 · Cited by 289
Habitus Transformation and Hidden Injuries: Successful Working-class University Students
Lehmann, W. (2014) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/0038040713498777 · Cited by 287
Jury, M., Smeding, A., Stephens, N. M., Nelson, J. E., Aelenei, C., & Darnon, C. (2017) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12202 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J.
- Venue
- British Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-124
- ISSN
- 0141-1926 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3518
- OpenAlex
- W2135435159
- Cited by
- 813
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 91.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working‐class students in UK higher education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01411920902878925
- The paper
- Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2010). ‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working‐class students in UK higher education. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902878925
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.