CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Critical and Liberation PedagogyRural and Ethnic EducationEducation Pedagogy and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Landless Workers Movement’s itinerant schools: occupying and transforming public education in Brazil

Mariano, Alessandro, Tarlau, Rebecca·2019·British Journal of Sociology of Education
DOI 10.1080/01425692.2019.1565989
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article explores how social movement co-governance of public education offers an alternative to neoliberal educational models. The Brazilian Landless Workers Movement (MST) is one of the largest social movements in Latin America. We describe one of the many schools that the MST co-governs, the Itinerant School Paths of Knowledge (Caminhos do Saber), located in an occupied encampment in the state of Paraná. We analyze three of the most unique pedagogical innovations in the school: the teacher’s incorporation of ‘portions of reality’ into classroom teaching, the student work collectives, and the participatory student evaluation process. Although these pedagogies are seemingly mundane changes to everyday school practice, we argue that they represent a challenge to the neoliberal educational model being implemented globally. These movement pedagogies are likely to continue, despite recent conservative attacks, and they offer several concrete lessons for how to effectively contest neoliberal educational practices in other global contexts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01425692.2019.1565989

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Caldart R. S, 2004, Pedagogia do movimento sem terra
  2. Freire P, 2000, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
  3. Freitas L. C, 2009, A Escola-Comuna
  4. Gramsci A, 1971, The Prison Notebooks
  5. Manacorda M. A, 2012, Karl marx e a liberdade
  6. Mariano A., 2015, “A autogestão nas escolas itinerantes nas escolas itinerantes do MST paraná.” in. UNIOESTE
  7. Marx K, 1976, Capital: Volume 1
  8. Pistrak M. M, 2009, A Escola-Comuna. Translated by Luis Carlos de Freitas
  9. Saviani D, 1973, Educação brasileira: Estrutura e sistema
  10. Shulgin V, 2013, Rumo Ao politecnismo
  11. Tarrow S, 1994, Power in Movement

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Mariano, A., & Tarlau, R.
Affiliations
  • Brazilian Landless Workers Movement, Escola Nacional Florestan Fernandes, Município de Guararema, Estado de São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Tarlau, Rebecca
Venue
British Journal of Sociology of Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-02-06
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
538-559
ISSN
  • 0142-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3346
DOI
10.1080/01425692.2019.1565989
OpenAlex
W2914084325
Semantic Scholar
03913f93c90867ba6ee9b44fbd2d67913e50f7fc
Cited by
8
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Rural and Ethnic Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
Landless Workers' Movement (MST), MST, social movements, neoliberalism in education, movement pedagogy, alternative education, Paraná

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review