Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spectral unmixing of vegetation, soil and dry carbon cover in arid regions: Comparing multispectral and hyperspectral observations

Asner, G. P., Heidebrecht, K. B.·2002·International Journal of Remote Sensing

Abstract

Remote measurements of the fractional cover of photosynthetic vegetation (PV), non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) and bare soil are critical to understanding climate and land-use controls over the functional properties of arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Spectral mixture analysis is a method employed to estimate PV, NPV and bare soil extent from multispectral and hyperspectral imagery. To date, no studies have systematically compared multispectral and hyperspectral sampling schemes for quantifying PV, NPV and bare soil covers using spectral mixture models. We tested the accuracy and precision of spectral mixture analysis in arid shrubland and grassland sites of the Chihuahuan Desert, New Mexico, USA using the NASA Airborne Visible and Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS). A general, probabilistic spectral mixture model, Auto-MCU, was developed that allows for automated sub-pixel cover analysis using any number or combination of optical wavelength samples. The model was tested with five different hyperspectral sampling schemes available from the AVIRIS data as well as with data convolved to Landsat TM, Terra MODIS, and Terra ASTER optical channels. Full-range (0.4-2.5 w m) sampling strategies using the most common hyperspectral or multispectral channels consistently over-estimated bare soil extent and under-estimated PV cover in our shrubland and grassland sites. This was due to bright soil reflectance relative to PV reflectance in visible, near-IR, and shortwave-IR channels. However, by utilizing the shortwave-IR2 region (SWIR2; 2.0-2.3 w m) with a procedure that normalizes all reflectance values to 2.03 w m, the sub-pixel fractional covers of PV, NPV and bare soil constituents were accurately estimated. AVIRIS is one of the few sensors that can provide the spectral coverage and signal-to-noise ratio in the SWIR2 to carry out this particular analysis. ASTER, with its 5-channel SWIR2 sampling, provides some means for isolating bare soil fractional cover within image pixels, but additional studies are needed to verify the results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01431160110115960

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Asner, G. P., & Heidebrecht, K. B.
Venue
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2002-01
Volume
23
Issue
19
Pages
3939-3958
ISSN
  • 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5901
OpenAlex
W2069921544
Cited by
424
References
1
FWCI
38.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.