Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 457

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The use of backpropagating artificial neural networks in land cover classification

Kavzoglu, T., Mather, P. M.·2003·International Journal of Remote Sensing

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are used for land cover classification using remotely sensed data. Training of a neural network requires that the user specifies the network structure and sets the learning parameters. In this study, the optimum design of ANNs for classification problems is investigated. Heuristics proposed by a number of researchers to determine the optimum values of network parameters are compared using two datasets. Those heuristics that produce the highest classification accuracies are tested using two independent datasets. Comparisons are also made among the ANNs designed using optimum settings, the ANNs based on the worst performing heuristics, and the maximum likelihood classifier. Results show that the use of ANNs with the settings recommended in this study can produce higher classification accuracies than either alternative. A number of guidelines are constructed from the experiences of this study for the effective design and use of artificial neural networks in the classification of remotely sensed image data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0143116031000114851

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kavzoglu, T., & Mather, P. M.
Venue
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2003-01
Volume
24
Issue
23
Pages
4907-4938
ISSN
  • 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5901
OpenAlex
W2130269771
Cited by
457
References
1
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.