Cited by 56Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationRemote Sensing in AgricultureRemote Sensing and Land Use

Mapping Selective Logging in Mixed Deciduous Forest

Open access
Lippitt, Christopher D., Rogan, John, Li, Zhe, Eastman, J. Ronald, Jones, Trevor G.·2008·Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing

Abstract

This study assesses the performance of five Machine Learning Algorithms (MLAS) in a chronically modified mixed deciduous forest in Massachusetts (USA) in terms of their ability to detect selective timber logging and to cope with deficient reference datasets. Multitemporal Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper-plus (ETM+) imagery is used to assess the performance of three Anificial Neural Networks - Multi-Layer Perceptron, ARTMAP, Self-Organizing Map, and two Classification Tree splitting algorithms: gini and entropy rules, MLA performance evaluations are based on susceptibility to reduced training set size, noise, and variations in the training set, as well as the operability/transparency of the classification process. Classification trees produced the most accurate selective logging maps (gini and entropy rule decision tree mean overall map accuracy = 94 percent and mean per-class kappa of 0.59 and 0.60, respectively). Classification trees are shown to be more robust and accurate when faced with deficient training data, regardless of splitting rule. Of the neural network algorithms, self-organizing maps were least sensitive to the introduction of noise and variations in training data. Given their robust classification capabilities and transparency of the class-selection process, classification trees are preferable algorithms for mapping selective logging and have potential in other forest monitoring applications. © 2008 American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14358/pers.74.10.1201

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML can be used with remote sensing imagery to pinpoint changes in forest cover, or proxies for deforestation such as smoke from fires set to clear vegetation, as well as to differentiate selective cutting from clearcutting.

    “ML can be used with remote sensing imagery to pinpoint changes in forest cover [241,329,369], or proxies for deforestation such as smoke from fires set to clear vegetation [505], as well as to differentiate selective cutting from clearcutting [342,487].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [487]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lippitt, C. D., Rogan, J., Li, Z., Eastman, J. R., & Jones, T. G.
Affiliations
Dakota State University (US)
Venue
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
Published
2008-10-01
Volume
74
Issue
10
Pages
1201-1211
ISSN
0099-1112 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171058578
Cited by
56
References
89
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
Keywords
selective logging, mixed deciduous forest, forest disturbance mapping, classification trees, artificial neural networks, self-organizing maps, multilayer perceptron, ARTMAP, Landsat ETM+ imagery, forest monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review