Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A multiscale texture analysis procedure for improved forest stand classification

Coburn, C. A., Roberts, A. C. B.·2004·International Journal of Remote Sensing

Abstract

Image texture is a complex visual perception. With the ever-increasing spatial resolution of remotely sensed data, the role of image texture in image classification has increased. Current approaches to image texture analysis rely on a single band of spatial information to characterize texture. This paper presents a multiscale approach to image texture where first and second-order statistical measures were derived from different sizes of processing windows and were used as additional information in a supervised classification. By using several bands of textural information processed with different window sizes (from 5×5 to 15×15) the main forest stands in the image were improved up to a maximum of 40%. A geostatistical analysis indicated that there was no single window size that would adequately characterize the range of textural conditions present in this image. A number of different statistical texture measures were compared for this image. While all of the different texture measures provided a degree of improvement (from 4 to 13% overall), the multiscale approach achieved a higher degree of classification accuracy regardless of which statistical procedure was used. When compared with single band texture measures, the level of overall improvement varied between 4 and 8%. The results indicate that this multiscale approach is an improvement over the current single band approach to analysing image texture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0143116042000192367

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Coburn, C. A., & Roberts, A. C. B.
Venue
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2004-10
Volume
25
Issue
20
Pages
4287-4308
ISSN
  • 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5901
OpenAlex
W2148115499
Cited by
273
References
0
FWCI
16.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.