The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale
Abstract
Phenological differences among vegetation types, reflected in temporal variations in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived from satellite data, have been used to classify land cover at continental scales. Extending this technique to global scales raises several issues: identifying land cover types that are spectrally distinct and applicable at the global scale; accounting for phasing of seasons in different parts of the world; validating results in the absence of reliable information on global land cover; and acquiring high quality global data sets of satellite sensor data for input to land cover classifications. For this study, a coarse spatial resolution (one by one degree) data set of monthly NDVI values for 1987 was used to explore these methodological issues. A result of a supervised, maximum likelihood classification of eleven cover types is presented to illustrate the feasibility of using satellite sensor data to increase the accuracy of global land cover information, although the result has not been validated systematically. Satellite sensor data at finer spatial resolutions that include other bands in addition to NDVI, as well as methodologies to better identify and describe gradients between cover types, could increase the accuracy of results of global land cover data sets derived from satellite sensor data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components
Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., & Falkowski, P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237 · Cited by 6,371
The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
Bond, W. J., Woodward, F. I., & Midgley, G. F. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x · Cited by 1,942
Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data
Friedl, M. A., & Brodley, C. E. (1997) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(97)00049-7 · Cited by 1,542
The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands
Campbell, J. E., Lobell, D. B., Genova, R. C., & Field, C. B. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es800052w · Cited by 709
Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges
Pettorelli, N., Laurance, W. F., O'Brien, T. G., Wegmann, M., Nagendra, H., & Turner, W. (2014) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12261 · Cited by 707
Metadata
- Authors
- DEFRIES, R. S., & TOWNSHEND, J. R. G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3567-3586
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2136783177
- Cited by
- 1,053
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01431169408954345
- The paper
- DEFRIES, R. S., & TOWNSHEND, J. R. G. (1994). NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169408954345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.