The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The thermal regime of urban parks in two cities with different summer climates
Abstract
Differences between the temperature of vegetated urban parks and that of their surrounding built environment are reported. The study is based on observations of surface and air temperature in Vancouver, BC and Sacramento, CA. during summer conditions. A combination of remotely sensed surface temperature and air temperature from fixed station and mobile (car and bicycle) traverses is used to characterize the magnitude of park-induced coolness the 'park cool island' (PCI) effect. Relatively large surface PCI are present by day and at night, although for different reasons. Air temperature effects are smaller. In Vancouver, parks are typically 1-2 C, but in ideal conditions can be almost 5 C cooler than their surroundings. Larger PCI are possible in Sacramento where irrigated greenspace can be 5-7 C cooler. Park type, especially the extent of irrigation and the presence of trees, is important in PCI development. During the day trees may play an important role in establishing a cool park effect, perhaps through a combination of shade and evaporative cooling. At night it appears that the surface geometry and moisture status of the park are important controls on surface cooling. Open parks (with higher sky view factors) that have dry soils (and hence lower thermal admittance) cool the most. Nocturnal cooling in open grass parks is often similar to that at rural sites. The influence of parks on air temperatures appears to be restricted to a distance of about one park width.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence
Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006 · Cited by 3,099
Norton, B. A., Coutts, A. M., Livesley, S. J., Harris, R. J., Hunter, A. M., & Williams, N. S. G. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018 · Cited by 1,288
Critical review on the cooling effect of urban blue-green space: A threshold-size perspective
Yu, Z., Yang, G., Zuo, S., Jørgensen, G., Koga, M., & Vejre, H. (2020) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126630 · Cited by 700
The effect of tree shade and grass on surface and globe temperatures in an urban area
Armson, D., Stringer, P., & Ennos, A. R. (2012) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.05.002 · Cited by 684
Review on the impact of urban geometry and pedestrian level greening on outdoor thermal comfort
Jamei, E., Rajagopalan, P., Seyedmahmoudian, M., & Jamei, Y. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.104 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Spronken-Smith, R. A., & Oke, T. R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2085-2104
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2079378643
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The thermal regime of urban parks in two cities with different summer climates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/014311698214884
- The paper
- Spronken-Smith, R. A., & Oke, T. R. (1998). The thermal regime of urban parks in two cities with different summer climates. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698214884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.