The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems
Abstract
Corporate codes of labour practice have proliferated as a result of trade union and ngo campaigns against poor labour conditions in global production. Analysis of global production systems highlights the complexity of commercial networks and the wider social and institutional environment in which codes operate. It posits tensions between a corporate approach focusing on compliance with outcome standards and a civil society approach focusing on process rights. A detailed study of codes operated by companies in the UK Ethical Trading Initiative finds that codes have led to improvements in outcome standards but little change in process rights for workers. The authors conclude that corporate codes have a role to play in improving labour standards, but are currently doing little to challenge existing commercial practices or embedded social relations that underpin poor labour standards in global production systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains
Nadvi, K. (2008) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn003 · Cited by 488
The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation
Lambin, E. F., Gibbs, H. K., Heilmayr, R., Carlson, K. M., Fleck, L. C., Garrett, R. D., le Polain de Waroux, Y., McDermott, C. L., McLaughlin, D., Newton, P., et al. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0061-1 · Cited by 481
Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Value Chains: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1796-x · Cited by 400
SMEs and CSR in Developing Countries
Jamali, D., Lund-Thomsen, P., & Jeppesen, S. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315571258 · Cited by 286
Supply chain transparency as a consumer or corporate tool: the case of Nudie Jeans Co
Egels-Zandén, N., & Hansson, N. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-015-9283-7 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrientos, S., & Smith, S.
- Venue
- Third World Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 713-729
- ISSN
- 0143-6597 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-2241
- OpenAlex
- W2165384789
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01436590701336580
- The paper
- Barrientos, S., & Smith, S. (2007). Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701336580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.