Supply chain transparency as a consumer or corporate tool: the case of Nudie Jeans Co
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a lack of evidence that consumers can leverage complex supply chain transparency information and assert their power through informed decision-making and preferences.
“Thus, there is a lack of evidence that consumers can leverage complex supply chain transparency information and assert their power through informed decision-making and preferences (Egels-Zandén and Hansson, 2016;Grunert et al., 2014;Janßen and Langen, 2017).”
From Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil (2020) · cites this paper as Egels-Zandén and Hansson, 2016
Cites
Lehnert, K., Park, Y.-H., & Singh, N. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2147-2 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Dingwerth, K., & Eichinger, M. (2010) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00015 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil
Mammadova, A., Behagel, J., & Masiero, M. (2020) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.03.008 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Egels-Zandén, N., & Hansson, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Policy
- Published
- 2015-02-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 377-395
- ISSN
- 0168-7034 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0700
- OpenAlex
- W2046763874
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 13.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Keywords
- supply chain transparency, corporate transparency, purchase intention, consumer pressure, outsourcing, anti-sweatshop movement, sustainability reporting, corporate sales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
