The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ‘Global South’ in the study of world politics: examining a meta category
Open accessAbstract
This introductory contribution examines the ‘Global South’ as a meta category in the study of world politics. Against the backdrop of a steep rise in references to the ‘Global South’ across academic publications, we ask whether and how the North–South binary in general, and the ‘(Global) South’ in particular, can be put to use analytically. Building on meta categories as tools for the classification of global space, we discuss the increasing prominence of the ‘Global South’ and then outline different understandings attached to it, notably socio-economic marginality, multilateral alliance-building and resistance against global hegemonic power. Following an overview of individual contributions to this volume, we reflect on the analytical implications for using the ‘Global South’ category in academic research. Insights from China, the Caribbean, international negotiations or academic knowledge production itself not only point to patterns of shared experiences but also highlight the heterogeneity of ‘Southern’ realities and increasing levels of complexity that cut across the North–South divide. Overall, we argue for an issue-based and field-specific use of the ‘Global South’ as part of a broader commitment to a more deliberate, explicit and differentiated engagement with taken-for-granted categories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY
Quijano, A. (2007) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502380601164353 · Cited by 3,747
World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction
Wallerstein, I. (2004) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822399018 · Cited by 1,638
Theory from the South: Or, how Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa
Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2012) · Anthropological Forum · doi:10.1080/00664677.2012.694169 · Cited by 1,350
Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies
Acharya, A. (2014) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12171 · Cited by 847
Dados, N., & Connell, R. (2012) · Contexts · doi:10.1177/1536504212436479 · Cited by 816
International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2009)
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-0052 · Cited by 696
Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World
Hojtnan, D. E. (1995) · International Affairs · doi:10.2307/2624882 · Cited by 566
The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography
Lewis, M. W., & Wigen, K. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520918597 · Cited by 522
The poorer nations: a possible history of the Global South
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-1604 · Cited by 490
South–South cooperation and the rise of the Global South
Gray, K., & Gills, B. K. (2016) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1128817 · Cited by 366
Cited by
Ghai, S., Fassi, L., Awadh, F., & Orben, A. (2023) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026221114859 · Cited by 55
From ‘debt diplomacy’ to donorship? China’s changing role in global development
Carmody, P., Zajontz, T., & Reboredo, R. (2022) · Global Political Economy · doi:10.1332/uzhw7185 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Haug, S., Braveboy-Wagner, J., & Maihold, G.
- Venue
- Third World Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-09-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1923-1944
- ISSN
- 0143-6597 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-2241
- OpenAlex
- W3198193400
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 121.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ‘Global South’ in the study of world politics: examining a meta category. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01436597.2021.1948831
- The paper
- Haug, S., Braveboy-Wagner, J., & Maihold, G. (2021). The ‘Global South’ in the study of world politics: examining a meta category. Third World Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1948831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.