Cited by 55Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Lack of Sample Diversity in Research on Adolescent Depression and Social Media Use: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Ghai, Sakshi, Fassi, Luisa, Awadh, Faisal, Orben, Amy·2023·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

Research on whether social media use relates to adolescent depression is rapidly increasing. However, is it adequately representing the diversity of global adolescent populations? We conducted a preregistered scoping review (research published between 2018 and 2020; 34 articles) to investigate the proportion of studies recruiting samples from the Global North versus Global South and assess whether the association between social media and depression varies depending on the population being studied. Sample diversity was lacking between regions: More than 70% of studies examined Global North populations. The link between social media and depression was positive and significant in the Global North but null and nonsignificant in the Global South. There was also little evidence of diversity within regions in both sampling choices and reporting of participants’ demographics. Given that most adolescents live in the Global South and sample diversity is crucial for the generalizability of research findings, urgent action is needed to address these oversights.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/21677026221114859

Cites

50 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research suggests that the psychological impact of social media appears to be very different in the Global North versus the Global South, or in established democracies versus less-established democracies.

    “Moreover, recent research suggests that the psychological impact of social media appears to be very different in the Global North versus the Global South (Ghai et al. 2023), or in established democracies versus less-established democracies (Lorenz-Spreen et al. 2023).”

    From Social Media and Morality. (2024) · cites this paper as Ghai et al. 2023

    The Results (Sample diversity between regions; page not provided) report a small, significant association between social media use and adolescent depression in Global North samples, but a nonsignificant association in Global South samples. The Discussion says the evidence for a North–South difference is mixed, and the moderation analysis found no significant difference by region. Because the studies were correlational, the paper also does not establish a psychological impact caused by social media. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hughes J. L. Camden A. A. Yangchen T. (2016). Rethinking and updating demographic questions: Guidance to improve descriptions of research samples [Editorial]. Journal of Psychological Research, 21(3), 138– 151.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghai, S., Fassi, L., Awadh, F., & Orben, A.
Affiliations
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Ghai, Sakshi
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2023-02-07
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
759-772
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W4319788437
Cited by
55
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • G.C Grindley Fund
  • Christ’s College Bursary
  • medical research council
  • emmanuel college, university of cambridge
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adolescent depression, social media use, sample diversity, Global South, Global North, research generalizability, regional variation, sampling bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review