Fixated on Ability: Questioning Ableist Metaphors in Feminist Theories of Resistance
Abstract
This essay examines the ubiquitous use of ableist metaphors in contemporary feminist discourses and outlines two particular ways in which feminist theorists use disability to locate objects of remediation: first, the construction of disability in opposition to knowledge and second, the use of disability to highlight the subtle workings of power and privilege. In addition, we critique ableist notions of mobility and movement, which are used to define and imagine liberation, resistance, and transformation. Because many rhetorical uses of disability reinscribe normative and exclusionary paradigms within otherwise libratory feminist theories, we assert the need for new metaphors and frames of reference to more adequately theorize multiplicity and to more fully realize social transformation. Transforming the ways we use language in order to more fully realize its paradoxes and playfulness will, we argue, yield more intersectional analyses and more fruitful political coalitions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When CRT and other scholars of race, racism, and white supremacy use dis/ability as a metaphor for lacking, it signifies a deep misunderstanding of how ability and dis/ability are socially constructed.
“Moreover, when CRT and other scholars of race, racism, and white supremacy use dis/ability as a metaphor for lacking, it signifies a deep misunderstanding of how ability and dis/ability are socially constructed (May and Ferri 2005).”
From Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society (2017) · cites this paper as May and Ferri 2005
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 29,585 · see citing works
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445 · see citing works
Claiming disability: knowledge and identity
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-6303 · Cited by 1,518 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability
Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511 · Cited by 1,272 · see citing works
Self-citationAnnamma, S. A., Jackson, D. D., & Morrison, D. (2017) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837 · Cited by 738 · see citing works
Race and Disability: From Analogy to Intersectionality
Frederick, A., & Shifrer, D. (2019) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/2332649218783480 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
- Authors
- May, V. M., & Ferri, B. A.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- Venue
- Prose Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 120-140
- ISSN
- 0144-0357 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9426
- OpenAlex
- W1589478255
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Prose Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- ableism, disability, feminist theory, remediation, power and privilege, mobility (physical function), liberation, resistance, social change, intersectionality, political alliances, disability rhetoric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review