Cited by 48Disability Rights and RepresentationFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesGender and Feminist Studies

Fixated on Ability: Questioning Ableist Metaphors in Feminist Theories of Resistance

May, Vivian M., Ferri, Beth A.·2005·Prose Studies

Abstract

This essay examines the ubiquitous use of ableist metaphors in contemporary feminist discourses and outlines two particular ways in which feminist theorists use disability to locate objects of remediation: first, the construction of disability in opposition to knowledge and second, the use of disability to highlight the subtle workings of power and privilege. In addition, we critique ableist notions of mobility and movement, which are used to define and imagine liberation, resistance, and transformation. Because many rhetorical uses of disability reinscribe normative and exclusionary paradigms within otherwise libratory feminist theories, we assert the need for new metaphors and frames of reference to more adequately theorize multiplicity and to more fully realize social transformation. Transforming the ways we use language in order to more fully realize its paradoxes and playfulness will, we argue, yield more intersectional analyses and more fruitful political coalitions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01440350500068999

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
May, V. M., & Ferri, B. A.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Venue
Prose Studies
Published
2005-04
Volume
27
Issue
1-2
Pages
120-140
ISSN
  • 0144-0357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9426
OpenAlex
W1589478255
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Prose Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
ableism, disability, feminist theory, remediation, power and privilege, mobility (physical function), liberation, resistance, social change, intersectionality, political alliances, disability rhetoric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review