Cited by 1,591Urban Transport and AccessibilityTransportation Planning and OptimizationRailways and European Transport Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany

Pucher, John, Buehler, Ralph·2008·Transport Reviews

Abstract

This article shows how the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany have made bicycling a safe, convenient and practical way to get around their cities. The analysis relies on national aggregate data as well as case studies of large and small cities in each country. The key to achieving high levels of cycling appears to be the provision of separate cycling facilities along heavily travelled roads and at intersections, combined with traffic calming of most residential neighbourhoods. Extensive cycling rights of way in the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany are complemented by ample bike parking, full integration with public transport, comprehensive traffic education and training of both cyclists and motorists, and a wide range of promotional events intended to generate enthusiasm and wide public support for cycling. In addition to their many pro‐bike policies and programmes, the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany make driving expensive as well as inconvenient in central cities through a host of taxes and restrictions on car ownership, use and parking. Moreover, strict land‐use policies foster compact, mixed‐use developments that generate shorter and thus more bikeable trips. It is the coordinated implementation of this multi‐faceted, mutually reinforcing set of policies that best explains the success of these three countries in promoting cycling. For comparison, the article portrays the marginal status of cycling in the UK and the USA, where only about 1% of trips are by bike.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01441640701806612

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 2007, Public Transportation Fact Book
  2. Andersen, T. Odense: The National Cycle City of Denmark . PowerPoint presentation made at the Annual Conference of the Bicycling Federation of Australia. October62005, Brisbane.
  3. 2007, 2001 Census of Population and Housing, Journey to Work Files
  4. Boehme, S. Fahrradfahren in Muenster . PowerPoint presentation provided directly by City of Muenster's Department of Transport Planning. Muenster. pp.86
  5. 2007, WISQARS: Web‐based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System
  6. 2003, The Amsterdam Bicycle Policy
  7. 2003, Bicycling Facts and Figures
  8. 2007, Choosing for the Cyclist: Bicycle Program 2007–2010
  9. 2003, Urban Transport in Berlin: Focus on Bicycling
  10. 2005, Bauordnung fuer Berlin. City Construction Code
  11. 2007, Fahrradverkehr [Bicycling Transportation in Berlin]
  12. 2007, Bike 2015 Plan for the City of Chicago
  13. 2002, Cycle Policy
  14. 2004, Bicycle Account
  15. 2007, City Profile
  16. 2007, Key Figures
  17. 2004, Fahrradhauptstadt Muenster [Muenster–German Capital of Cycling]
  18. 2007, Verkehrsplanung in Muenster [Transportation Planning in Muenster]
  19. 2007, National Cycle City (Cycleby) Website
  20. 2007, Portland, Oregon: Creating a World‐Class Bicycling City
  21. 2007, Poised at the Threshold
  22. 2007, Portland Bicycle Counts, 2007
  23. 2000, Promoting Safer Cycling: A Strategy
  24. 2007, Danish National Travel Surveys
  25. 2005, Cycling Fact Sheet
  26. 2006, National Travel Survey 2005
  27. 2007, National Travel Statistics
  28. 2006, Continuous and Integral: The Cycling Policies of Groningen and other European Cities
  29. 2004, National Policies to Promote Cycling
  30. 2002, EU Energy and Transport in Figures, 2000
  31. 2003, EU Energy and Transport in Figures, 2001
  32. 2006, EU Energy and Transport in Figures, 2005
  33. 2002, FahrRad! Ride Your Bike! National Bicycle Plan
  34. 2003, German Federal Travel Survey 2002 (MiD)
  35. 2006, Strassenverkehrsordnung [German Traffic Laws]
  36. 2007, German Transportation in Figures
  37. 2007, Call a Bike
  38. Langenberg P., 2000, Cycling in Amsterdam. Developments in the City
  39. 2005, National Travel Statistics
  40. 1999, The Dutch Bicycle Master Plan
  41. 2006, Cycling in the Netherlands
  42. 2007, Passenger Kilometers of Cycling and Fatality Rates (data gathered directly from the ministry of transport)
  43. 2007, PlaNYC: A Greener, Greater New York
  44. 2007, NYC Bicycle Counts on a Single Weekday (7am to 7pm) at Selected Commuter Locations (1980–2007)
  45. 2004, Fahrradfreundliche Staedte und Gemeinden in Nordrhein‐Westfalen: Eine Zwischenbilanz [Bicycling Friendly Cities in North‐Rhine Westphalia]
  46. 2005, OECD Statistics
  47. 2007, OV‐Fiets: A Fast and Easy Bike Rental
  48. Pucher J., 1997, Transportation Quarterly, 51, 31
  49. Pucher J., 2000, Transportation Quarterly, 54, 25
  50. Pucher J., 1999, Transportation Research A, 33, 625
  51. 2007, Verkehrsmittelwahl in Deutschland [Transport Mode Choice in Germany]
  52. 2007, Where Canadians Work and How They Get There
  53. 1999, Staat der Wegen: Lengte van Fietspaden en—stoken, per Province [Extent of Bicycling Paths and Lanes by Province]
  54. 2005, Transportation Statistics
  55. 2007, Transportation Statistics
  56. 2007, Bicycling and Walking in the US: Benchmarking Report, 2007
  57. 2003, Impacts of 20 mph Zones in London Boroughs
  58. 2007, Congestion Charging: Fourth Annual Impacts Report
  59. 2001, Making Transit Work: Insights from Western Europe, Canada, and the United States
  60. 1994, National Bicycling and Walking Study: Transportation Choices for a Changing America
  61. 2003, National Household Travel Survey, 2001
  62. 2004, National Bicycling and Walking Study: Ten Year Status Report
  63. 2007, Traffic Safety Fact Sheets

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,591

Metadata

Authors
Pucher, J., & Buehler, R.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Pucher, John
Venue
Transport Reviews
Published
2008-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
495-528
ISSN
  • 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5327
OpenAlex
W2164133872
Cited by
1,591
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 134 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 111 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 119 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 75
FWCI
135.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transport Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Railways and European Transport Policy
Keywords
cycling promotion, cycling infrastructure, traffic calming, bicycle parking, public transport integration, road safety education, motor vehicle tax, parking restrictions, land use policy, urban travel behavior, Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review