The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ridesharing in North America: Past, Present, and Future
Open accessAbstract
Since the late 1990s, numerous ridematching programmes have integrated the Internet, mobile phones, and social networking into their services. Online ridematching systems are employing a range of new strategies to create “critical mass”: (1) regional and large employer partnerships, (2) financial incentives, (3) social networking to younger populations, and (4) real-time ridematching services that employ “smartphones” and automated ridematching software. Enhanced casual carpooling approaches, which focus on “meeting places”, are also being explored. Today, ridesharing represents approximately 8–11% of the transportation modal share in Canada and the USA, respectively. There are approximately 638 ridematching programmes in North America. Ridesharing's evolution can be categorized into five phases: (1) World War II car-sharing (or carpooling) clubs; (2) major responses to the 1970s energy crises; (3) early organized ridesharing schemes; (4) reliable ridesharing systems; and (5) technology-enabled ridematching. While ridesharing's future growth and direction are uncertain, the next decade is likely to include greater interoperability among services, technology integration, and stronger policy support. In light of growing concerns about climate change, congestion, and oil dependency, more research is needed to better understand ridesharing's impacts on infrastructure, congestion, and energy/emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slugging in Houston — Casual Carpool Passenger Characteristics
Burris, M., & Winn, J. (2006) · Journal of Public Transportation · doi:10.5038/2375-0901.9.5.2 · Cited by 62
Cited by
Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers
(2016) · International journal of communication · Cited by 990
Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T., & Kandampully, J. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004 · Cited by 554
Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., Fang, J., & Zhang, G. (2015) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.006 · Cited by 422
Automated Vehicles, On-Demand Mobility, and Environmental Impacts
Greenblatt, J. B., & Shaheen, S. (2015) · Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports · doi:10.1007/s40518-015-0038-5 · Cited by 407
Self-citationShared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling
Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2019) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1497728 · Cited by 372
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, N. D., & Shaheen, S. A.
- Venue
- Transport Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-112
- ISSN
- 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5327
- OpenAlex
- W2049896260
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.