Cited by 372Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationSharing Economy and Platforms

Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling

Shaheen, Susan, Cohen, Adam·2019·Transport Reviews

Abstract

Shared ride services allow riders to share a ride to a common destination. They include ridesharing (carpooling and vanpooling); ridesplitting (a pooled version of ridesourcing/transportation network companies); taxi sharing; and microtransit. In recent years, growth of Internet-enabled wireless technologies, global satellite systems, and cloud computing - coupled with data sharing – are causing people to increase their use of mobile applications to share a ride. Some shared ride services, such as carpooling and vanpooling, can provide transportation, infrastructure, environmental, and social benefits. This paper reviews common shared ride service models, definitions, and summarises existing North American impact studies. Additionally, we explore the convergence of shared mobility; electrification; and automation, including the potential impacts of shared automated vehicle (SAV) systems. While SAV impacts remain uncertain, many practitioners and academic research predict higher efficiency, affordability, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. The impacts of SAVs will likely depend on the number of personally owned automated vehicles; types of sharing (concurrent or sequential); and the future modal split among public transit, shared fleets, and pooled rides. We conclude the paper with recommendations for local governments and public agencies to help in managing the transition to highly automated vehicles and encouraging higher occupancy modes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01441647.2018.1497728

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonprofit ridesharing can reduce infrastructure demand by easing congestion or parking needs.

    “It can also lower infrastructure demand in the form of congestion or parking allocation (Shaheen and Chan 2016; Shaheen et al. 2018).”

    From A cross-cultural study of nonprofit self-organized ridesharing (2024) · cites this paper as Shaheen et al. 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Shaheen, Susan
Venue
Transport Reviews
Published
2018-07-11
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
427-442
ISSN
  • 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5327
OpenAlex
W2872332010
Cited by
372
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 4
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transport Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
Keywords
ride-sharing, carpooling, vanpooling, ride-hailing, taxi sharing, microtransit, shared mobility, shared automated vehicles, vehicle automation, electrification, modal split, greenhouse gas emissions, local government policy, North America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review